Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    HONOR Malaysia teases the arrival of Magic8 Pro

    Adios, Windows: These alternatives make switching from Microsoft easy

    Unlock 10,000+ hours of courses in 14 languages with Babbel

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Business Technology
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Gadgets
    • Gaming
    • Health
    • Software and Apps
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    Tech AI Verse
    • Home
    • Artificial Intelligence

      Amazon to lay off 14,000 corporate employees

      October 29, 2025

      Elon Musk launches Grokipedia as an alternative to ‘woke’ Wikipedia

      October 29, 2025

      Fears of an AI bubble are growing, but some on Wall Street aren’t worried just yet

      October 18, 2025

      The sleeper issue that could play a huge role in Virginia and New Jersey — and the midterms

      October 16, 2025

      California bill regulating top AI companies signed into law

      September 30, 2025
    • Business

      Government faces questions about why US AWS outage disrupted UK tax office and banking firms

      October 23, 2025

      Amazon’s AWS outage knocked services like Alexa, Snapchat, Fortnite, Venmo and more offline

      October 21, 2025

      SAP ECC customers bet on composable ERP to avoid upgrading

      October 18, 2025

      Revenue generated by neoclouds expected to exceed $23bn in 2025, predicts Synergy

      October 15, 2025

      You can now try Fortnite directly in Discord

      October 8, 2025
    • Crypto

      America.Fun Wants To Fix the Pump.Fun Problem — But Will It Succeed?

      November 2, 2025

      XRP Inches Closer to Its Glory Zone — Only 2% Stands in the Way

      November 2, 2025

      SOL Outflows Drop 83%, But One Factor Keeps Solana Price in Check

      November 2, 2025

      Bitwise Solana ETF Draws Record Inflows in First Trading Week

      November 2, 2025

      Bitcoin Price Chart Still Screams Bullish — So Why Is the Breakout Stalling?

      November 2, 2025
    • Technology

      Adios, Windows: These alternatives make switching from Microsoft easy

      November 3, 2025

      Unlock 10,000+ hours of courses in 14 languages with Babbel

      November 3, 2025

      Crush productivity with this $50 MS Office lifetime license + tutorial

      November 3, 2025

      Radeon 6000 GPUs were brand new 3 years ago. AMD’s already dropping support

      November 3, 2025

      Why you should wrap your car keys in aluminum foil

      November 3, 2025
    • Others
      • Gadgets
      • Gaming
      • Health
      • Software and Apps
    Check BMI
    Tech AI Verse
    You are at:Home»Technology»A budget gamer for $1,200: HP Victus 15 RTX 5050 laptop review
    Technology

    A budget gamer for $1,200: HP Victus 15 RTX 5050 laptop review

    TechAiVerseBy TechAiVerseOctober 28, 2025No Comments52 Mins Read0 Views
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    A budget gamer for $1,200: HP Victus 15 RTX 5050 laptop review
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    A budget gamer for $1,200: HP Victus 15 RTX 5050 laptop review – NotebookCheck.net Reviews

    At a current price of around $1,200, the review model Victus 15-fa2160ng doesn’t have it all its own way in a competitive market. Compared to other RTX 5050 laptops, the price is commendable and finds itself on the lower end of the scale. However, for a similar price, there’s also the Lenovo LOQ Essential 15, which, according to the spec sheet, aims to turn customer’s heads with a better display (100% sRGB). Unlike its Lenovo competitors, the Full HD IPS panel installed in the Victus 15 has to put up with a poor color gamut, which makes content appear rather washed out. To make matters worse, the first RTX 5060 laptops are already being sold at a relatively small premium, with some of them (depending on the application) offering a decent, if not earth-shattering performance boost. 

    Basically, buyers will know what to expect in the $1,000 segment. The plastic case and speakers are of average quality, as are the battery capacity and connectivity (no USB 4). However, the upgrade options have turned out to be quite positive. In addition to two M.2 slots, the 15-inch model also includes two SO-DIMM banks. Noise and temperature production under load are also better than a number of competing devices.

    Pros

    + consistent performance

    + two RAM as well as two SSD slots

    + moderate emissions

    Cons

    – CPU somewhat outdated

    – limited color space

    – no card reader

    The HP Victus 15-fa2160ng can be purchased on various online stores starting at around $1,200.

    Processor

    Intel Core i5-13420H 8 x 1.5 – 4.6 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

    Memory

    24 GB 

    , SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (one empty)

    Display

    15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, CMN1560, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz

    Mainboard

    Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

    Storage

    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU, 512 GB 

    , NVMe-SSD, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)

    Soundcard

    Intel Alder Point-M/P PCH – HD Audio

    Connections

    3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Line-In/Out

    Networking

    Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4

    Size

    height x width x depth (in mm): 23.5 x 358 x 255 ( = 0.93 x 14.09 x 10.04 in)

    Battery

    70 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 Cells

    Operating System

    Microsoft Windows 11 Home

    Camera

    Webcam: HD 720p
    Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

    Additional features

    Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200 W Power Supply, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty

    Weight

    2.356 kg ( = 83.11 oz / 5.19 pounds), Power Supply: 660 g ( = 23.28 oz / 1.46 pounds)

    Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

    One area you shouldn’t expect particularly high quality is the case. The 15-inch devices’ surfaces are entirely made of plastic and tend to rattle here and there. The build quality, however, is beyond reproach, with all elements of the review device blending seamlessly together. The display’s maximum opening angle of around 135° is neither small nor especially large.

    At 2.4 kg, the Victus 15 is more or less in line with its 15- and 16-inch counterparts, although the 17-inch Erazer Scout is just under 0.3 kg heavier. The HP laptop’s height of almost 2.4 cm (without its feet) is also not out of the ordinary.

    397 mm / 15.6 in 276 mm / 10.9 in 26 mm / 1.024 in 2.7 kg5.97 lbs360 mm / 14.2 in 259 mm / 10.2 in 24 mm / 0.945 in 2.4 kg5.39 lbs358 mm / 14.1 in 255 mm / 10 in 24 mm / 0.945 in 2.3 kg5.13 lbs358 mm / 14.1 in 255 mm / 10 in 23.5 mm / 0.925 in 2.4 kg5.19 lbs357.5 mm / 14.1 in 269 mm / 10.6 in 23.7 mm / 0.933 in 2.4 kg5.28 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

    Interfaces

    The connectivity proves to be somewhat lacking. Buyers will not only have to do without modern USB protocols, but also without a card reader. However, the port distribution is quite well-designed, since they are located at the rear of the sides, and therefore hardly interfere during mouse use.

    The installed Realtek Wi-Fi module (RTL8852BE) is somewhat faster than the MediaTek chip found in its predecessor, but it still can’t reach truly high speeds. Only the Erazer Scout’s performance managed to impress us in our test comparison field.

    05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip

    As with most laptops, the webcam quality is best left unsaid. Both the color accuracy and the image sharpness also leave a lot to be desired.

    12.7 ∆E

    15 ∆E

    16.1 ∆E

    16 ∆E

    14.8 ∆E

    13.8 ∆E

    15.2 ∆E

    20.7 ∆E

    16.7 ∆E

    12 ∆E

    13.1 ∆E

    10.3 ∆E

    12.1 ∆E

    16.1 ∆E

    20.9 ∆E

    8.9 ∆E

    17.5 ∆E

    18.2 ∆E

    0.6 ∆E

    8.9 ∆E

    13.1 ∆E

    12.7 ∆E

    7.1 ∆E

    2 ∆E

    ColorChecker HP Victus 15-fa2160ng: 13.11 ∆E min: 0.6 – max: 20.89 ∆E

    The laptop comes with a few information booklets and a 200-watt power supply.

    The base plate is secured by seven small Phillips screws and several hooks, some of which are very tight. Under the hood, you have access to every component (see photos).

    Unfortunately, HP still uses various plastic films for its packaging material.

    The warranty in Germany covers 12 months.

    The input devices are relatively good, without inspiring enthusiasm. The keyboard uses the entire width of the case and features a full-size numeric keypad and white, single-level backlighting. We’d describe the layout as a touch confusing – especially when it comes to the upper right corner and the position of the power button, as well as the “Insert,” “Print Screen,” and “Delete” keys. Some users may also long for larger arrows.

    The touchpad delivers discreet performance. Its 12.5 x 8 cm surface offers solid gliding characteristics and is mostly responsive. However, the click surfaces tend to rattle – as is the case with numerous other laptops.

    Unfortunately, the Victus 15 doesn’t boast a vivid display. Unlike some competitors, the 144 Hz panel is weak, particularly in terms of color coverage. While 64% sRGB is slightly better than its predecessor, it’s still pretty underwhelming.

    296
    cd/m²
    295
    cd/m²
    283
    cd/m²
    296
    cd/m²
    324
    cd/m²
    292
    cd/m²
    314
    cd/m²
    315
    cd/m²
    313
    cd/m²

    Distribution of brightness

    CMN1560 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

    Maximum: 324 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 303.1 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
    Brightness Distribution: 87 %
    Center on Battery: 324 cd/m²
    Contrast: 1246:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
    ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
    calibrated: 2.93
    ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
    34.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
    64.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
    43% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
    Gamma: 2.21
    CCT: 7541 K

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    CMN1560, IPS, 1920×1080, 15.6″, 144 Hz
    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    BOE094D, IPS, 1920×1080, 15.6″, 144 Hz
    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920×1080, 17.3″, 144 Hz
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920×1080, 15.6″, 144 Hz
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AUODBB2, IPS, 1920×1200, 16″, 144 Hz
    Display

    -1%

    -4%

    70%

    -2%

    Display P3 Coverage (%)

    43

    39.2

    -9%

    37.7

    -12%

    67.3

    57%

    40

    -7%

    sRGB Coverage (%)

    64.3

    57.9

    -10%

    56.3

    -12%

    99.2

    54%

    58.1

    -10%

    AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)

    34.7

    40.5

    17%

    39

    12%

    69.1

    99%

    38.7

    12%

    Response Times

    18%

    25%

    -13%

    3%

    Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)

    28.6

    In its factory state, the panel is generally not color-accurate due to having a strong blue hue, which can, however, be corrected by calibration.

    Providing you don’t take the laptop outside or into the sun, the rest of the results are solid. This starts with a black level of 0.26 cd/m², which, combined with a brightness of approximately 300 cd/m², results in an IPS-typical contrast ratio of more than 1,200:1. Viewing angles and response times are also decent.

    Display Response Times

    ℹ

    Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       ↔    Response Time Black to White
    20 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 10.7 ms rise
    ↘ 9.3 ms fall
    The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
    In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
    This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
    28.6 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 13.4 ms rise
    ↘ 15.2 ms fall
    The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
    In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
    This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

    Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

    ℹ

    To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

    Screen flickering / PWM not detected

    In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

    While the review configuration’s 24 GB of DDR5 RAM is quite respectable, at 512 GB, the SSD could be larger. HP is also using an outdated processor for price reasons.

    The Omen Gaming Hub offers four operating modes, with our tests being based on the performance profile.

    Omen Gaming Hub
    Mode Silent Eco Standard Performance
    Cyberpunk 2077 Noise 35 dB(A) 37 dB(A) 41 dB(A) 46 dB(A)
    Cyberpunk 2077 Performance (FHD/Ultra) 38.7fps 56.7fps 67.3fps 71fps
    Cyberpunk 2077 GPU Power Draw ~30 W ~60 W ~70 W ~80 W
    Cinebench R15 Multi Score 1,422 points 839 points 1,703 points 1,756 points

    In the meantime, the Core i5-13420H is a few years old and still manufactured using the outdated 10nm process. The Raptor Lake model contains four performance cores, including Hyper-Threading and eight efficiency cores without HT. This allows a total of 20 threads to be processed simultaneously. In the benchmark test, the Victus 15 ended up at the bottom of the test field, although the predecessor’s Core i5-13500H and the Core 5 210H found in the Scout 17 E1 are often only marginally faster. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 250 offers more than 30 % additional performance, and the Ryzen 9 8940HX housed in the Omen 16, almost 70 %.

    0215430645860107512901505172019352150236525802795301032253440365538704085Tooltip
    CPU Performance rating – Percent
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    85.1 pt

    Average of class Gaming
     


    84.7 pt

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    65.8 pt

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    55.3 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -4!
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    51.8 pt

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
     


    50.2 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    49.1 pt

    Cinebench R23
    Multi Core
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    27145 Points +145%

    Average of class Gaming
      (5668 – 40970, n=145, last 2 years)





    25153 Points +127%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    16154 Points +46%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    14081 Points +27%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    12609 Points +14%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    11084 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (8691 – 11871, n=4)





    10374 Points -6%

    Single Core
    Average of class Gaming
      (1136 – 2267, n=145, last 2 years)





    1978 Points +17%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    1917 Points +13%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    1767 Points +5%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    1704 Points +1%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (1673 – 1705, n=4)





    1691 Points 0%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    1689 Points

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    1649 Points -2%

    Cinebench R20
    CPU (Multi Core)
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    10439 Points +146%

    Average of class Gaming
      (2179 – 16108, n=144, last 2 years)





    9687 Points +128%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    6320 Points +49%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    5345 Points +26%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    4855 Points +14%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    4252 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (3329 – 4524, n=4)





    4079 Points -4%

    CPU (Single Core)
    Average of class Gaming
      (439 – 870, n=144, last 2 years)





    764 Points +18%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    745 Points +15%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    694 Points +7%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    685 Points +6%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    655 Points +1%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (641 – 655, n=4)





    649 Points 0%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    647 Points

    Cinebench R15
    CPU Multi 64Bit
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX




    4296 (4037.14min – 4295.53max) Points +147%

    Average of class Gaming
      (1537 – 6271, n=144, last 2 years)





    3893 Points +124%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250




    2544 (2446.48min – 2543.88max) Points +46%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H




    2239 (1813.15min – 2238.76max) Points +29%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H





    1850 (1711.45min – 1850.05max) Points +6%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H




    1738 (1461.13min – 1737.69max) Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (1492 – 1815, n=4)





    1679 Points -3%

    CPU Single 64Bit
    Average of class Gaming
      (188.8 – 343, n=143, last 2 years)





    293 Points +25%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    292 Points +24%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    279 Points +19%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    247 Points +5%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    243 Points +3%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (235 – 244, n=4)





    240 Points +2%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    235 Points

    Blender – v2.79 BMW27 CPU
    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (289 – 403, n=4)





    330 Seconds * -3%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    319 Seconds *

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    265 Seconds * +17%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    260 Seconds * +18%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    204 Seconds * +36%

    Average of class Gaming
      (80 – 517, n=140, last 2 years)





    154.2 Seconds * +52%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    116 Seconds * +64%

    7-Zip 18.03
    7z b 4
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    103455 MIPS +156%

    Average of class Gaming
      (23795 – 148086, n=142, last 2 years)





    91186 MIPS +126%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    63475 MIPS +57%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    52066 MIPS +29%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    45778 MIPS +13%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    40421 MIPS

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (35680 – 44970, n=4)





    39427 MIPS -2%

    7z b 4 -mmt1
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    7407 MIPS +48%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    6485 MIPS +30%

    Average of class Gaming
      (4199 – 7508, n=142, last 2 years)





    6392 MIPS +28%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    5519 MIPS +10%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    5324 MIPS +6%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (5003 – 5331, n=4)





    5214 MIPS +4%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    5003 MIPS

    Geekbench 6.5
    Multi-Core
    Average of class Gaming
      (5340 – 22104, n=142, last 2 years)





    15595 Points +85%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    11447 Points +36%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    9956 Points +18%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    9453 Points +12%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (7216 – 9262, n=4)





    8541 Points +1%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    8444 Points

    Single-Core
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    2816 Points +26%

    Average of class Gaming
      (1490 – 3253, n=142, last 2 years)





    2778 Points +25%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    2586 Points +16%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (2231 – 2365, n=4)





    2292 Points +3%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    2231 Points

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    2199 Points -1%

    Geekbench 5.5
    Multi-Core
    Average of class Gaming
      (4557 – 27010, n=141, last 2 years)





    16726 Points +114%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    13357 Points +71%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    9720 Points +24%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    8899 Points +14%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    7811 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (6895 – 8336, n=4)





    7742 Points -1%

    Single-Core
    Average of class Gaming
      (986 – 2423, n=141, last 2 years)





    2001 Points +26%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    1961 Points +24%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    1911 Points +21%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    1734 Points +10%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (1583 – 1669, n=4)





    1631 Points +3%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    1583 Points

    HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 – 4k Preset
    Average of class Gaming
      (7.7 – 44.3, n=142, last 2 years)





    27.1 fps +124%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    25.7 fps +112%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    18.1 fps +50%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    14.6 fps +21%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    14.4 fps +19%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    12.1 fps

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (8.75 – 13.3, n=4)





    11.5 fps -5%

    LibreOffice – 20 Documents To PDF
    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    69.8 s *

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    65.5 s * +6%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    64.1 s * +8%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (46.5 – 69.8, n=4)





    59.5 s * +15%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    53.5 s * +23%

    Average of class Gaming
      (19 – 88.8, n=141, last 2 years)





    47.6 s * +32%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    45.9 s * +34%

    R Benchmark 2.5 – Overall mean
    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H


    0.545 sec *

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (0.501 – 0.545, n=4)





    0.521 sec * +4%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H


    0.51 sec * +6%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H


    0.4932 sec * +10%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250


    0.4471 sec * +18%

    Average of class Gaming
      (0.3551 – 0.759, n=143, last 2 years)





    0.4281 sec * +21%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    0.4215 sec * +23%

    * … smaller is better

    Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

    235 Points

    Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

    1738 Points

    Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

    144.2 fps

    Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

    99.6 %

    Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

    4252 Points

    Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

    647 Points

    Cinebench R23 Single Core

    1689 Points

    Cinebench R23 Multi Core

    11084 Points

    Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

    518 Points

    Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

    95 Points

    Help

    Performance rating
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    94.3 pt

    Average of class Gaming
     


    73.3 pt

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    57 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    38.3 pt

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    37.2 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    32.8 pt

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
     


    32.8 pt

    AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    43311 KRay/s +323%

    Average of class Gaming
      (7192 – 85542, n=140, last 2 years)





    28185 KRay/s +176%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    24656 KRay/s +141%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    12857 KRay/s +26%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    11489 KRay/s +12%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    10227 KRay/s

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (7922 – 11106, n=4)





    9941 KRay/s -3%

    AIDA64 / FPU Julia
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    171374 Points +234%

    Average of class Gaming
      (35040 – 252486, n=140, last 2 years)





    127261 Points +148%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    98709 Points +92%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    61679 Points +20%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    57595 Points +12%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    51376 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (40587 – 59715, n=4)





    51293 Points 0%

    AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    7988 MB/s +224%

    Average of class Gaming
      (1728 – 10389, n=140, last 2 years)





    5850 MB/s +137%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    4563 MB/s +85%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    2621 MB/s +6%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    2468 MB/s

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (1724 – 2634, n=4)





    2285 MB/s -7%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    2180 MB/s -12%

    AIDA64 / CPU Queen
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    169334 Points +143%

    Average of class Gaming
      (50699 – 200651, n=140, last 2 years)





    119677 Points +71%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    114915 Points +65%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    77835 Points +12%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    76434 Points +9%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (69803 – 74956, n=4)





    71512 Points +2%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    69803 Points

    AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    26855 Points +308%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    14798 Points +125%

    Average of class Gaming
      (5020 – 33636, n=140, last 2 years)





    14395 Points +118%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    7538 Points +14%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    6589 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (5485 – 6625, n=4)





    6330 Points -4%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    5715 Points -13%

    AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    90684 Points +255%

    Average of class Gaming
      (17585 – 134044, n=140, last 2 years)





    65586 Points +157%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    53836 Points +111%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    28657 Points +12%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    26483 Points +4%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    25553 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (19684 – 27607, n=4)





    24713 Points -3%

    AIDA64 / CPU AES
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    150768 MB/s +205%

    Average of class Gaming
      (19065 – 247074, n=140, last 2 years)





    109362 MB/s +121%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    68090 MB/s +38%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    62657 MB/s +27%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (35531 – 93100, n=4)





    56477 MB/s +14%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    51414 MB/s +4%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    49420 MB/s

    AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    1784 MB/s +145%

    Average of class Gaming
      (373 – 2531, n=140, last 2 years)





    1532 MB/s +110%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    1074 MB/s +48%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    947 MB/s +30%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    728 MB/s

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (509 – 744, n=4)





    674 MB/s -7%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    635 MB/s -13%

    AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    23193 KRay/s +316%

    Average of class Gaming
      (3856 – 45446, n=140, last 2 years)





    15086 KRay/s +171%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    13039 KRay/s +134%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    6106 KRay/s +9%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    5928 KRay/s +6%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    5577 KRay/s

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (4283 – 5831, n=4)





    5353 KRay/s -4%

    AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
    Average of class Gaming
      (10805 – 62916, n=140, last 2 years)





    42854 MPixel/s +92%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    37988 MPixel/s +70%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    26998 MPixel/s +21%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (12330 – 37044, n=4)





    23774 MPixel/s +6%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    23228 MPixel/s +4%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    22348 MPixel/s

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    18283 MPixel/s -18%

    The system’s performance is sometimes affected by its rather weak SSD (more on that later). Applications sometimes take a bit longer to launch or load than on comparable devices.

    Performance rating
    Average of class Gaming
     


    92.3 pt

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    88.9 pt

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2!
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    80.8 pt

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 -4!
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    71.9 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -5!
    GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    71 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    65.7 pt

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
     


    65.7 pt

    PCMark 10 / Score
    Average of class Gaming
      (5776 – 9852, n=119, last 2 years)





    8073 Points +39%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    8054 Points +38%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    7304 Points +25%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    6812 Points +17%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    5828 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    5828 Points 0%

    PCMark 10 / Essentials
    Average of class Gaming
      (8840 – 12600, n=123, last 2 years)





    10754 Points +22%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    10709 Points +21%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    10292 Points +16%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    9521 Points +8%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    9067 Points +3%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    8840 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    8840 Points 0%

    PCMark 10 / Productivity
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    9831 Points +44%

    Average of class Gaming
      (6662 – 14612, n=119, last 2 years)





    9830 Points +44%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    9226 Points +35%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    8890 Points +30%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    6845 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    6845 Points 0%

    PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
    Average of class Gaming
      (7440 – 19351, n=119, last 2 years)





    13674 Points +54%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    13465 Points +52%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    11137 Points +25%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    10134 Points +14%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    8879 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    8879 Points 0%

    CrossMark / Overall
    Average of class Gaming
      (1247 – 2344, n=114, last 2 years)





    1984 Points +45%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    1903 Points +39%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    1746 Points +28%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    1618 Points +18%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    1366 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    1366 Points 0%

    CrossMark / Productivity
    Average of class Gaming
      (1299 – 2211, n=114, last 2 years)





    1863 Points +34%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    1831 Points +32%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    1764 Points +27%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    1585 Points +14%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    1386 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    1386 Points 0%

    CrossMark / Creativity
    Average of class Gaming
      (1275 – 2729, n=114, last 2 years)





    2215 Points +60%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    2112 Points +52%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    1757 Points +27%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    1706 Points +23%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    1387 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    1387 Points 0%

    CrossMark / Responsiveness
    Average of class Gaming
      (1030 – 2330, n=114, last 2 years)





    1736 Points +39%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    1664 Points +33%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    1562 Points +25%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    1471 Points +18%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    1249 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    1249 Points 0%

    WebXPRT 3 / Overall
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    322 Points +30%

    Average of class Gaming
      (237 – 532, n=117, last 2 years)





    315 Points +28%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    267 Points +8%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    247 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    247 Points 0%

    WebXPRT 4 / Overall
    Average of class Gaming
      (176.4 – 345, n=113, last 2 years)





    284 Points +26%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    253 Points +12%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    240 Points +6%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    226 Points

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    226 Points 0%

    Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    577 ms *

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (n=1)





    577 ms * -0%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    545 ms * +6%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    543 ms * +6%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    534 ms * +7%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    509 ms * +12%

    Average of class Gaming
      (397 – 674, n=127, last 2 years)





    473 ms * +18%

    * … smaller is better

    PCMark 10 Score 5828 points

    Help

    AIDA64 / Memory Copy
    Average of class Gaming
      (21750 – 104987, n=140, last 2 years)





    70703 MB/s +109%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    58240 MB/s +72%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    44253 MB/s +31%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (22003 – 59609, n=4)





    37838 MB/s +12%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    35838 MB/s +6%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    33849 MB/s

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    29102 MB/s -14%

    AIDA64 / Memory Read
    Average of class Gaming
      (22956 – 104349, n=140, last 2 years)





    73602 MB/s +97%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    58128 MB/s +56%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    46858 MB/s +26%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (23759 – 68085, n=4)





    42242 MB/s +13%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    37325 MB/s

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    35634 MB/s -5%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    30770 MB/s -18%

    AIDA64 / Memory Write
    Average of class Gaming
      (22297 – 133486, n=140, last 2 years)





    72141 MB/s +103%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    58085 MB/s +63%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    46904 MB/s +32%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    42376 MB/s +19%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (21429 – 62529, n=4)





    38997 MB/s +10%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    35568 MB/s

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    32239 MB/s -9%

    AIDA64 / Memory Latency
    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    103.6 ns *

    Average of class Gaming
      (59.5 – 259, n=140, last 2 years)





    101.6 ns * +2%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


    99.9 ns * +4%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    98.4 ns * +5%

    Average Intel Core i5-13420H
      (90.2 – 103.6, n=4)





    96.6 ns * +7%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


    87.5 ns * +16%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


    83.5 ns * +19%

    * … smaller is better

    Latency is also less than perfect. The LatencyMon tool identified potential issues for certain applications.

    DPC Latencies / LatencyMon – interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    4787 μs * -29%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    3702 μs *

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    3622 μs * +2%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    1425.3 μs * +61%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    1229.6 μs * +67%

    * … smaller is better

    As previously mentioned, the SSD isn’t among the fastest models. It achieved solid sequential results and didn’t throttle in the loop test. This is an area where most of the competitors still have their noses in front – even its predecessor.

    CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
    4987 MB/s

    CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
    2844 MB/s

    CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
    461.2 MB/s

    CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
    443.8 MB/s

    CDM 5 Read Seq:
    2146 MB/s

    CDM 5 Write Seq:
    2757 MB/s

    CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
    61.31 MB/s

    CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
    150.9 MB/s

    Drive Performance rating – Percent
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    91 pt

    Average of class Gaming
     


    77.9 pt

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    68.6 pt

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    61.4 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    60.8 pt

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
     


    52.4 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    49.2 pt

    DiskSpd
    seq read
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




    3632 (3569.55min – 3631.92max) MB/s +55%

    Average of class Gaming
      (281 – 8300, n=125, last 2 years)





    3495 MB/s +49%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1





    3031 (2761.74min – 3031.45max) MB/s +29%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





    2866 (2793.62min – 2866.04max) MB/s +22%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T




    2751 (2717.09min – 2750.83max) MB/s +17%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (2348 – 2738, n=2)





    2543 MB/s +8%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU




    2348 (1978.66min – 2347.68max) MB/s

    seq write
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




    5256 (5197.58min – 5255.67max) MB/s +84%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T





    4251 (3917.4min – 4251.35max) MB/s +49%

    Average of class Gaming
      (1247 – 9699, n=125, last 2 years)





    3986 MB/s +40%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1





    3704 (3259.18min – 3704.34max) MB/s +30%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





    3526 (3357.33min – 3526.44max) MB/s +24%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (2853 – 2887, n=2)





    2870 MB/s +1%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





    2853 (2754.08min – 2853.34max) MB/s

    seq q8 t1 read
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




    7258 (6649.77min – 7257.61max) MB/s +44%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN





    7004 (5842.1min – 7004.24max) MB/s +39%

    Average of class Gaming
      (2644 – 15056, n=125, last 2 years)





    6911 MB/s +37%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





    6270 (5201.78min – 6270.02max) MB/s +25%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T





    5846 (5427.01min – 5846.07max) MB/s +16%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





    5029 (4142.71min – 5029.17max) MB/s

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (5008 – 5029, n=2)





    5019 MB/s 0%

    seq q8 t1 write
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




    6103 (6005.82min – 6102.92max) MB/s +118%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




    5750 (5600.99min – 5749.76max) MB/s +105%

    Average of class Gaming
      (1281 – 13519, n=125, last 2 years)





    5564 MB/s +99%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T





    5471 (5285.79min – 5471.43max) MB/s +95%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





    5013 (4747.47min – 5013.45max) MB/s +79%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (2801 – 2873, n=2)





    2837 MB/s +1%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





    2801 (2775.9min – 2801.17max) MB/s

    4k q1 t1 read
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




    76.5 (75.54min – 76.49max) MB/s +24%

    Average of class Gaming
      (32.2 – 110.2, n=125, last 2 years)





    69.3 MB/s +12%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (61.8 – 61.9, n=2)





    61.9 MB/s 0%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





    61.8 (60.32min – 61.82max) MB/s

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T




    61.6 (60.1min – 61.6max) MB/s 0%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G




    58 (56.64min – 57.95max) MB/s -6%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




    51.7 (50.4min – 51.66max) MB/s -16%

    4k q1 t1 write
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




    247 (242.52min – 246.64max) MB/s +63%

    Average of class Gaming
      (78 – 397, n=125, last 2 years)





    211 MB/s +39%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T





    179.1 (173.23min – 179.12max) MB/s +18%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (152 – 170.2, n=2)





    161.1 MB/s +6%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU




    152 (148.54min – 152max) MB/s

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G




    137.8 (136.03min – 137.79max) MB/s -9%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




    96.7 (95.77min – 96.65max) MB/s -36%

    4k q32 t16 read
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




    4137 (4111.19min – 4136.71max) MB/s +341%

    Average of class Gaming
      (417 – 8067, n=125, last 2 years)





    2574 MB/s +174%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T




    2354 (2337.78min – 2354max) MB/s +151%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (939 – 1751, n=2)





    1345 MB/s +43%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





    939 (881.99min – 939.36max) MB/s

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1





    889 (844.18min – 889.18max) MB/s -5%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





    864 (769.87min – 864.23max) MB/s -8%

    4k q32 t16 write
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




    3371 (3357.07min – 3370.53max) MB/s +556%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T




    2348 (2236.98min – 2347.75max) MB/s +357%

    Average of class Gaming
      (162.3 – 5653, n=125, last 2 years)





    2158 MB/s +320%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (514 – 1626, n=2)





    1070 MB/s +108%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU




    514 (503.15min – 513.84max) MB/s

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





    452 (444.25min – 452.18max) MB/s -12%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




    356 (352.83min – 355.66max) MB/s -31%

    AS SSD
    Score Total
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    8387 Points +124%

    Average of class Gaming
      (2858 – 13854, n=123, last 2 years)





    6906 Points +84%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    5084 Points +36%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    4983 Points +33%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    4745 Points +27%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (3745 – 3775, n=2)





    3760 Points 0%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    3745 Points

    Score Read
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    3093 Points +169%

    Average of class Gaming
      (953 – 4418, n=123, last 2 years)





    2375 Points +107%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    1672 Points +46%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    1384 Points +21%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    1331 Points +16%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (1148 – 1479, n=2)





    1314 Points +14%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    1148 Points

    Score Write
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    3725 Points +81%

    Average of class Gaming
      (1375 – 7208, n=123, last 2 years)





    3375 Points +64%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    3046 Points +48%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    2843 Points +38%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    2555 Points +24%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    2059 Points

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (1608 – 2059, n=2)





    1834 Points -11%

    Seq Read
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    5402.1 MB/s +66%

    Average of class Gaming
      (2272 – 9890, n=123, last 2 years)





    5274 MB/s +63%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    5161.69 MB/s +59%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    4595 MB/s +42%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    4523.34 MB/s +39%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (3245 – 3935, n=2)





    3590 MB/s +11%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    3244.89 MB/s

    Seq Write
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    5036.34 MB/s +166%

    Average of class Gaming
      (114.5 – 9926, n=123, last 2 years)





    3941 MB/s +108%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    3249 MB/s +71%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    2706.08 MB/s +43%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    2348.36 MB/s +24%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (1896 – 2410, n=2)





    2153 MB/s +14%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    1896.49 MB/s

    4K Read
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    79.42 MB/s +30%

    Average of class Gaming
      (27.8 – 108.4, n=123, last 2 years)





    68.5 MB/s +12%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    61.02 MB/s

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    58.8 MB/s -4%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    58.66 MB/s -4%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    56.57 MB/s -7%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (50 – 61, n=2)





    55.5 MB/s -9%

    4K Write
    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    251.38 MB/s +35%

    Average of class Gaming
      (75.6 – 512, n=123, last 2 years)





    218 MB/s +17%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    189.4 MB/s +2%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    185.71 MB/s

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    180.28 MB/s -3%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (153.7 – 185.7, n=2)





    169.7 MB/s -9%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    75.56 MB/s -59%

    4K-64 Read
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    2473.44 MB/s +224%

    Average of class Gaming
      (517 – 3630, n=123, last 2 years)





    1781 MB/s +134%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    1160.79 MB/s +52%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (763 – 1036, n=2)





    899 MB/s +18%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    866 MB/s +14%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    762.74 MB/s

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    758.5 MB/s -1%

    4K-64 Write
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    3146.3 MB/s +87%

    Average of class Gaming
      (991 – 5909, n=123, last 2 years)





    2766 MB/s +64%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    2532 MB/s +50%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    2392.18 MB/s +42%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    2068.42 MB/s +23%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    1683.79 MB/s

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (1213 – 1684, n=2)





    1448 MB/s -14%

    Access Time Read
    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    0.146 ms *

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (0.051 – 0.146, n=2)





    0.0985 ms * +33%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    0.098 ms * +33%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    0.095 ms * +35%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    0.075 ms * +49%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    0.069 ms * +53%

    Average of class Gaming
      (0.016 – 0.379, n=123, last 2 years)





    0.05744 ms * +61%

    Access Time Write
    Average of class Gaming
      (0.012 – 0.277, n=123, last 2 years)





    0.04041 ms * -102%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


    0.022 ms * -10%

    Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
      (0.02 – 0.023, n=2)





    0.0215 ms * -8%

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


    0.021 ms * -5%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


    0.02 ms *

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


    0.019 ms * +5%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


    0.015 ms * +25%

    * … smaller is better

    036573010951460182521902555292032853650401543804745511054755840620565706935Tooltip

    HP has opted to use a limited TGP for its graphics card. While the RTX 5050 in the Scout 17 E1 runs at a maximum of 115 watts, the Victus 15 only uses a maximum of 80 watts, something clearly evident from the measurements. Medion’s competitor gains a few percent in 3DMark tests, although the predecessor’s RTX 4050 lags behind by about 15%. Meanwhile, the RTX 5060 achieves an increase of 18 to 27%.

    3DMark 11 Performance 25519 points
    3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 50444 points
    3DMark Fire Strike Score 22488 points
    3DMark Time Spy Score 9098 points

    Help

    Blender
    v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H


    30 Seconds * -7%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core 5 210H


    29 Seconds * -4%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (28 – 29, n=2)





    28.5 Seconds * -2%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core i5-13420H


    28 Seconds *

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250


    21 Seconds * +25%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    21 Seconds * +25%

    Average of class Gaming
      (9 – 95, n=139, last 2 years)





    19.2 Seconds * +31%

    v3.3 Classroom CUDA
    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H


    52 Seconds * -4%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core 5 210H


    50 Seconds * -0%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core i5-13420H


    50 Seconds *

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (50 – 50, n=2)





    50 Seconds * -0%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250


    38 Seconds * +24%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


    38 Seconds * +24%

    Average of class Gaming
      (15 – 110, n=140, last 2 years)





    31.9 Seconds * +36%

    * … smaller is better

    You shouldn’t expect the RTX 5050 to exceed its native 1,920 x 1,080 pixels when gaming, but if you exclude extremely demanding or poorly optimized games such as Oblivion Remastered and Borderlands 4, most titles run smoothly in Full HD even at maximum settings. Anyone seeking higher frame rates could consider upscaling in addition to reducing the detail level. Using DLSS Quality, for example, the frame rate in Battlefield 6 rose from 54 to 69fps, and with quadruple frame generation, it even peaked at 149fps, although subjectively the image appeared very uneven.

    Performance rating – Percent
    Average of class Gaming
     


    99 pt

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX


    88.9 pt

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250


    80.7 pt

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H


    75.5 pt

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
     


    71.6 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H


    66.3 pt

    Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
    Average of class Gaming
      (17.7 – 169.9, n=141, last 2 years)





    101.1 fps +42%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    88.6 (71min) fps +25%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX




    86.6 (59min) fps +22%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    76.9 (63min) fps +8%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (71 – 76.9, n=3)





    74.4 fps +5%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    71 (56min) fps

    Baldur’s Gate 3 – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
    Average of class Gaming
      (37.2 – 246, n=107, last 2 years)





    134.8 fps +68%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX


    109.1 fps +36%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    101 (49.2min, 62.3P0.1, 91.9P1) fps +26%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    86.3 (77.3min, 77.6P0.1, 78.9P1) fps +7%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (80.4 – 86.3, n=3)





    82.5 fps +3%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    80.4 (32.8min, 47.1P0.1, 69.4P1) fps

    GTA V – 1920×1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX




    127.5 (2.93min, 83.3P1) fps +45%

    Average of class Gaming
      (12.1 – 186.9, n=130, last 2 years)





    124.3 fps +41%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    117.6 (27.6min, 83.3P1) fps +33%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    108.7 (8.82min, 76.9P1) fps +23%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (88.1 – 117.6, n=3)





    106.2 fps +21%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    88.1 (18min, 55.6P1) fps

    Final Fantasy XV Benchmark – 1920×1080 High Quality
    Average of class Gaming
      (19.2 – 215, n=141, last 2 years)





    135.9 fps +58%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250


    118.1 fps +37%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX


    111 fps +29%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H


    102 fps +18%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (86.2 – 102, n=3)





    96.2 fps +12%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H


    86.2 fps

    Strange Brigade – 1920×1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
    Average of class Gaming
      (38.9 – 456, n=129, last 2 years)





    260 fps +50%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    223 (32.5min, 170P1) fps +29%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX




    217.8 (86.3min, 152.5P1) fps +26%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    189.6 (107.2min, 138.3P1) fps +9%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (173.4 – 189.7, n=3)





    184.2 fps +6%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    173.4 (80.7min, 122.2P1) fps

    Dota 2 Reborn – 1920×1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX




    161.6 (132.4min) fps +39%

    Average of class Gaming
      (65.1 – 248, n=143, last 2 years)





    154.3 fps +33%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    121.5 (104.6min) fps +5%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    119.9 (92.2min) fps +3%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (116.2 – 119.9, n=2)





    118.1 fps +2%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    116.2 (96.1min) fps

    X-Plane 11.11 – 1920×1080 high (fps_test=3)
    Average of class Gaming
      (33.4 – 150.2, n=146, last 2 years)





    103.9 fps +59%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX


    93.9 fps +43%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H


    77.1 fps +18%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250


    72.1 fps +10%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (65.5 – 77.1, n=2)





    71.3 fps +9%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H


    65.5 fps

    Performance rating – Percent
    Average of class Gaming
     


    100 pt

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250


    73.9 pt

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H


    72.1 pt

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
     


    67.4 pt

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H


    62.5 pt

    The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
    Average of class Gaming
      (22.9 – 61.9, n=15, last 2 years)





    39.4 fps +72%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    26.5 (9.18min, 9.5P0.1, 13.9P1) fps +16%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    25 (4.14min, 6.43P0.1, 18.6P1) fps +9%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (22.9 – 25, n=2)





    24 fps +5%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    22.9 (6.7min, 7.24P0.1, 11.7P1) fps

    Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset
    Average of class Gaming
      (46.8 – 130.3, n=14, last 2 years)





    82 fps +75%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    61.1 (48.6min, 48.8P0.1, 50.9P1) fps +31%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    51.6 (41.3min, 42P0.1, 43.1P1) fps +10%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (46.8 – 51.6, n=2)





    49.2 fps +5%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    46.8 (31min, 31.9P0.1, 38.7P1) fps

    Stalker 2 – 1920×1080 Epic Preset
    Average of class Gaming
      (33.8 – 147.6, n=17, last 2 years)





    57.6 fps +70%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    42 (18.3min, 21.8P0.1, 29.9P1) fps +24%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    39.9 (30.4min, 30.4P0.1, 33.2P1) fps +18%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (33.8 – 39.9, n=2)





    36.9 fps +9%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    33.8 (24.5min, 24.6P0.1, 25.7P1) fps

    Space Marine 2 – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
    Average of class Gaming
      (52.8 – 108, n=15, last 2 years)





    79 fps +50%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    70.8 (46.3min, 51P0.1, 58.1P1) fps +34%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    65.2 (45.7min, 49P0.1, 50P1) fps +23%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (52.8 – 70.8, n=2)





    61.8 fps +17%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    52.8 (26min, 28.7P0.1, 35.8P1) fps

    Senua’s Saga Hellblade 2 – 1920×1080 High Preset
    Average of class Gaming
      (33.9 – 86.1, n=17, last 2 years)





    53.1 fps +57%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    40.8 (37min, 37.6P0.1, 38.2P1) fps +20%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    35.1 (32.4min, 32.6P0.1, 33.5P1) fps +4%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (33.9 – 35.1, n=2)





    34.5 fps +2%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    33.9 (23.3min, 27.8P0.1, 31.1P1) fps

    Horizon Forbidden West – 1920×1080 Very High Preset AA:T
    Average of class Gaming
      (14.7 – 140.3, n=21, last 2 years)





    76.2 fps +42%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




    62 (50min, 50.3P0.1, 51P1) fps +15%

    Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
      (53.8 – 62, n=2)





    57.9 fps +8%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




    53.8 (33.4min, 37P0.1, 41.8P1) fps

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




    52.9 (35.4min, 36.5P0.1, 40.5P1) fps -2%

    One positive aspect in the long-term test with Cyberpunk 2077 was the absence of any anomalies relating to throttling or the like.

    05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip

    In 3D-based operations, the Victus 15 is quieter than the competition, although the average recorded noise level of 46 dB(A) during Cyberpunk 2077 is by no means quiet. Compared to its predecessor, the noise levels under load don’t seem to have increased. When the laptop is inactive, the fans are still constantly active in performance mode, reaching just under 30 dB(A).

    Noise level

    Idle

    28 / 29 / 30 dB(A)

    Load 40 / 48 dB(A)
     
     

    30 dB
    silent

    40 dB(A)
    audible

    50 dB(A)
    loud

     

    min: , med: , max:    Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)

    dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.341.140.838.441.72539.538.536.535.938.43142.747.344.243.445.24029.931.229.631.530.85036.627.230.528.835.56326.624.734.924.131.78019.618.317.515.626.410021.517.517.315.825.912523.718181628.61602619.419.917.128.12002824.722.622.230.62502620.320.116.129.531526.717.219.213.131.14003023.420.911.933.850030.82221.911.336.663028.818.419.610.735.480029.417.119.71136100029.714.41911.236.9125030.413.918.110.537.4160029.113.3171136.9200028.713.617.511.537250028.514.317.811.837.7315027.214.117.612.435.1400027.312.916.312.434.4500027.413.113.312.633.9630023.4131312.735.180001913.413.212.931.31000016.713.513.112.725.91250014.91312.912.321.91600013.212.111.911.718.9SPL4027.929.724.347.7N3.411.20.66.2median 27.3median 14.3median 17.8median 12.4median 33.9Delta3.82.72.91.74hearing rangehide median Fan Noise

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
    Noise

    -2%

    -9%

    -32%

    1%

    off / environment * (dB)

    24

    25

    -4%

    24

    -0%

    25

    -4%

    23

    4%

    Idle Minimum * (dB)

    28

    29

    -4%

    27

    4%

    43

    -54%

    23

    18%

    Idle Average * (dB)

    29

    30

    -3%

    29

    -0%

    45

    -55%

    23

    21%

    Idle Maximum * (dB)

    30

    31

    -3%

    32

    -7%

    48

    -60%

    27.64

    8%

    Load Average * (dB)

    40

    40

    -0%

    47

    -18%

    53

    -33%

    49.5

    -24%

    Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)

    46

    55

    -20%

    51

    -11%

    49.5

    -8%

    Load Maximum * (dB)

    48

    48

    -0%

    58

    -21%

    53

    -10%

    52.73

    -10%

    Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)

    42

    * … smaller is better

     The perfectly acceptable maximum case temperatures on the top and bottom of 43°C are quite moderate. In idle mode, most areas remain below the 30°C mark.

      38 °C
    100 F
    43 °C
    109 F
    42 °C
    108 F
     
      29 °C
    84 F
    40 °C
    104 F
    37 °C
    99 F
     
      23 °C
    73 F
    27 °C
    81 F
    28 °C
    82 F
     
    Maximum: 43 °C = 109 F
    Average: 34.1 °C = 93 F
    43 °C
    109 F
    42 °C
    108 F
    37 °C
    99 F
    39 °C
    102 F
    41 °C
    106 F
    27 °C
    81 F
    28 °C
    82 F
    27 °C
    81 F
    23 °C
    73 F
    Maximum: 43 °C = 109 F
    Average: 34.1 °C = 93 F

    Power Supply (max.)  42 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

    (±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
    (±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
    (±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
    (+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
    (±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
    (+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
    (±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).

    The components also don’t get excessively hot, and the CPU and GPU settled to 74 °C and 77 °C, in the stress test using the Furmark and Prime95 tools.

    When it comes to sound quality, the Victus 15 outperforms the Erazer Scout 17. Overall, however, the sound can still only be described as mid-range. As is very often the case, the bass is particularly lacking.

    dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.448.92535.941.83143.448.94031.532.45028.828.36324.127.28015.620.610015.820.91251632.116017.139.420022.247.825016.155.931513.159.640011.965.550011.365.963010.767.78001165.9100011.266.4125010.568.816001171.1200011.573.1250011.869.5315012.467.8400012.470.9500012.674.9630012.772.4800012.973.41000012.774.51250012.360.91600011.755.7SPL24.383N0.656.6median 12.4median 66.4Delta1.77.535.53734.435.143.842.93030.725.624.424.125.915.72213.120.113.330.514.839.918.148.613.854.312.952.213.457.213.158.912.164.211.370.811.267.611.363.711.560.111.562.612.46812.56512.767.913.459.213.459.113.251.51347.412.54812.155.824.676.80.637.2median 12.9median 58.90.67.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

    Thanks in no small part to its limited TGP, the 15-inch model is generally more economical than the competition. 8 to 13 watts in idle mode and 78 to 187 watts under load are acceptable for the performance on offer.

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
    Average of class Gaming
     
    Power Consumption

    -2%

    -41%

    -52%

    -28%

    -76%

    Idle Minimum * (Watt)

    7.9

    5

    37%

    13.5

    -71%

    20

    -153%

    7.8

    1%

    14.1 4.3 – 41.5, n=122, last 2 years)

    -78%

    Idle Average * (Watt)

    9.2

    9

    2%

    14.8

    -61%

    20.7

    -125%

    8.8

    4%

    20 8 – 55.6, n=122, last 2 years)

    -117%

    Idle Maximum * (Watt)

    13.5

    22

    -63%

    22.9

    -70%

    22.7

    -68%

    21.5

    -59%

    27 9 – 101.1, n=122, last 2 years)

    -100%

    Load Average * (Watt)

    78

    72

    8%

    87

    -12%

    71

    9%

    119

    -53%

    111.3 59 – 201, n=120, last 2 years)

    -43%

    Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)

    128.4

    173.4

    -35%

    153.1

    -19%

    192

    -50%

    Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)

    126.7

    171.9

    -36%

    151.1

    -19%

    164.5

    -30%

    Load Maximum * (Watt)

    187

    176

    6%

    195

    -4%

    172

    8%

    208

    -11%

    262 122 – 431, n=122, last 2 years)

    -40%

    Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)

    113

    * … smaller is better

    0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
    0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip

    The runtime test was conducted using balanced mode. Interestingly, despite the identical battery capacity of 70 Wh, the runtime was significantly worse than its predecessor. Instead of around 7.5 hours, the new Victus 15 only kept going for just under 4 hours while surfing the internet, and this is comparable to both the Scout 17 E1 and the Lenovo LOQ 15.

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh
    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 53 Wh
    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh
    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh
    Average of class Gaming
     
    Battery runtime

    74%

    -9%

    5%

    16%

    52%

    WiFi v1.3 (h)

    4.3

    7.5

    74%

    3.9

    -9%

    4.5

    5%

    5

    16%

    6.55 1.417 – 14.8, n=124, last 2 years)

    52%

    Reader / Idle (h)

    6.9

    9.79 3.12 – 21.5, n=28, last 2 years)

    Load (h)

    1.3

    1.3

    1.42 0.683 – 2.73, n=61, last 2 years)

    H.264 (h)

    5.1

    7.74 2.15 – 15, n=41, last 2 years)

    With the RTX 5050 and RTX 5060 laptop prices often being quite similar, things are currently hot in the $1,000 segment. Before purchasing the Victus 15, you should be aware that HP has achieved this moderate price as a result of various cost-cutting measures, including the display.

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    – 10/24/2025 v8

    Florian Glaser

    Connectivity

    56 / 80 → 70%

    Application Performance

    77%

    Gaming – Weighted Average

    CO2 Emissions
    No Data

    Materials
    0%

    Packaging
    25%

    Power Use
    76.8%

    Repairability
    50%

    Software Updates
    22.3%

    Total Sustainability Score: 29%

    Image

    Model / Review

    Price

    Weight

    Height

    Display

    1.

    75.8%

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
    Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘
    24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
    Amazon:
    1. $885.00
    HP Victus 15 Intel i5-13420H…
    2. $649.00
    HP Victus 15 Gaming Laptop 1…
    3. $899.00
    HP Victus 15.6″ FHD 144Hz Ga…
    List Price: 1000 EUR
    2.4 kg 23.5 mm 15.60″
    1920×1080
    141 PPI
    IPS

    2.

    84% v7 (old)

    HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
    Intel Core i5-13500H ⎘
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
    Amazon:
    1. 
    15.6″ FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 144…
    2. $12.00
    RAKSTORE Laptop CPU Cooling …
    3. $129.99
    WARWOLFTEAM New Screen Compa…
    List Price: 1000 EUR
    2.3 kg 24 mm 15.60″
    1920×1080
    141 PPI
    IPS

    3.

    76.8%

    Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
    Intel Core 5 210H ⎘
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 1024 GB
    List Price: 1250 EUR 2.7 kg 26 mm 17.30″
    1920×1080
    127 PPI
    IPS

    4.

    77.5%

    Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
    AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
    Amazon:
    1. $1,569.00
    Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15…
    2. $37.99
    Ruilezyo 300W Laptop Charger…
    3. $101.68
    New KrystalPix LCD Display F…
    2.4 kg 24 mm 15.60″
    1920×1080
    141 PPI
    IPS

    5.

    82.5%

    HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
    AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD
    Amazon:
    1. $19.99
    BestParts New CPU+GPU Coolin…
    2. $16.99
    Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling …
    3. $35.99
    Replacement Backlit Keyboard…
    List Price: 1500 Euro
    2.4 kg 23.7 mm 16.00″
    1920×1200
    162 PPI
    IPS

    More articles related to this device

    HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (Victus 15 Series)

    Related Articles

    Transparency

    The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

    This is how Notebookcheck is testing

    Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

    Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser – Managing Editor Gaming Laptops – 679 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

    I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.

    Translator: Andrew Dickson – Translator – 163 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

    My lifelong passion for tech was born in a gadget-filled household in Scotland. From games consoles to cameras to computers. Early adopters, so early the phrase might have been coined with our family in mind.
    On finishing school, I trained and qualified as a golf professional before moving to Germany, where I have worked and lived for over 30 years.
    In 2002, I formed a successful English language centre, providing training, translations and digital learning systems to numerous businesses in the Rhein Neckar metropole area.
    Whether augmented or virtual reality, smart devices, mobile technology, sustainable environmental solutions, the tech world is as exciting now as it has ever been.
    Working with Notebookcheck allows me to combine my love of both tech and language.

    Florian Glaser, 2025-10-27 (Update: 2025-10-27)

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleFormer PlayStation boss Slams Sony’s live service push as ‘Repetitive action engagement device’
    Next Article Aoostar EG01: Aoostar releases new OCuLink eGPU solution with global launch pricing also revealed
    TechAiVerse
    • Website

    Jonathan is a tech enthusiast and the mind behind Tech AI Verse. With a passion for artificial intelligence, consumer tech, and emerging innovations, he deliver clear, insightful content to keep readers informed. From cutting-edge gadgets to AI advancements and cryptocurrency trends, Jonathan breaks down complex topics to make technology accessible to all.

    Related Posts

    Adios, Windows: These alternatives make switching from Microsoft easy

    November 3, 2025

    Unlock 10,000+ hours of courses in 14 languages with Babbel

    November 3, 2025

    Crush productivity with this $50 MS Office lifetime license + tutorial

    November 3, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Ping, You’ve Got Whale: AI detection system alerts ships of whales in their path

    April 22, 2025324 Views

    Lumo vs. Duck AI: Which AI is Better for Your Privacy?

    July 31, 202584 Views

    6.7 Cummins Lifter Failure: What Years Are Affected (And Possible Fixes)

    April 14, 202565 Views

    Is Libby Compatible With Kobo E-Readers?

    March 31, 202554 Views
    Don't Miss
    Gadgets November 3, 2025

    HONOR Malaysia teases the arrival of Magic8 Pro

    HONOR Malaysia teases the arrival of Magic8 Pro Its that time of the year for…

    Adios, Windows: These alternatives make switching from Microsoft easy

    Unlock 10,000+ hours of courses in 14 languages with Babbel

    Crush productivity with this $50 MS Office lifetime license + tutorial

    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    About Us
    About Us

    Welcome to Tech AI Verse, your go-to destination for everything technology! We bring you the latest news, trends, and insights from the ever-evolving world of tech. Our coverage spans across global technology industry updates, artificial intelligence advancements, machine learning ethics, and automation innovations. Stay connected with us as we explore the limitless possibilities of technology!

    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    HONOR Malaysia teases the arrival of Magic8 Pro

    November 3, 20254 Views

    Adios, Windows: These alternatives make switching from Microsoft easy

    November 3, 20255 Views

    Unlock 10,000+ hours of courses in 14 languages with Babbel

    November 3, 20253 Views
    Most Popular

    Xiaomi 15 Ultra Officially Launched in China, Malaysia launch to follow after global event

    March 12, 20250 Views

    Apple thinks people won’t use MagSafe on iPhone 16e

    March 12, 20250 Views

    French Apex Legends voice cast refuses contracts over “unacceptable” AI clause

    March 12, 20250 Views
    © 2025 TechAiVerse. Designed by Divya Tech.
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.