Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    ARC Raiders dev claims they built an auction house-like trading system for the game but later removed it as it’s “very risky territory”

    Citizen unveils 3 new tachymeter bezel chronographs with 43 mm stainless-steel cases

    Portable 27-inch monitor with Google TV, battery and built-in soundbar launches with discount

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Business Technology
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Gadgets
    • Gaming
    • Health
    • Software and Apps
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    Tech AI Verse
    • Home
    • Artificial Intelligence

      Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Elon Musk’s children, sues xAI over Grok sexual images

      January 17, 2026

      Anthropic joins OpenAI’s push into health care with new Claude tools

      January 12, 2026

      The mother of one of Elon Musk’s children says his AI bot won’t stop creating sexualized images of her

      January 7, 2026

      A new pope, political shake-ups and celebs in space: The 2025-in-review news quiz

      December 31, 2025

      AI has become the norm for students. Teachers are playing catch-up.

      December 23, 2025
    • Business

      New VoidLink malware framework targets Linux cloud servers

      January 14, 2026

      Nvidia Rubin’s rack-scale encryption signals a turning point for enterprise AI security

      January 13, 2026

      How KPMG is redefining the future of SAP consulting on a global scale

      January 10, 2026

      Top 10 cloud computing stories of 2025

      December 22, 2025

      Saudia Arabia’s STC commits to five-year network upgrade programme with Ericsson

      December 18, 2025
    • Crypto

      Trump Shifts on Fed Pick as Hassett Odds Fade: Who Will Replace Powell?

      January 17, 2026

      A Third of French Crypto Firms Still Unlicensed Under MiCA as Deadline Nears

      January 17, 2026

      DOJ Charges Venezuelan National in $1 Billion Crypto Laundering Scheme

      January 17, 2026

      One of Wall Street’s Top Strategists No Longer Trusts Bitcoin | US Crypto News

      January 17, 2026

      3 Altcoins To Watch This Weekend | January 17 – 18

      January 17, 2026
    • Technology

      ARC Raiders dev claims they built an auction house-like trading system for the game but later removed it as it’s “very risky territory”

      January 17, 2026

      Citizen unveils 3 new tachymeter bezel chronographs with 43 mm stainless-steel cases

      January 17, 2026

      Portable 27-inch monitor with Google TV, battery and built-in soundbar launches with discount

      January 17, 2026

      Civilization VII coming to iPhone and iPad

      January 17, 2026

      Flagship power with an XXL battery

      January 17, 2026
    • Others
      • Gadgets
      • Gaming
      • Health
      • Software and Apps
    Check BMI
    Tech AI Verse
    You are at:Home»Technology»Flagship power with an XXL battery
    Technology

    Flagship power with an XXL battery

    TechAiVerseBy TechAiVerseJanuary 17, 2026No Comments43 Mins Read0 Views
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    Flagship power with an XXL battery
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    Flagship power with an XXL battery – Honor Magic8 Pro smartphone review – NotebookCheck.net Reviews

    In our tests, the Honor Magic8 Pro proved itself to be a nearly complete flagship device, impressing us with its premium build quality, IP69K certification, and a vibrant LTPO OLED display boasting brightness of over 6,000 cd/m². The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 delivers excellent performance, though it throttles noticeably under sustained load. Other highlights include the seven-year update guarantee, versatile AI features (including an AI button), and comprehensive security options that include an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor and 3D facial recognition.

    The camera impressed us with detailed photos, a powerful periscope zoom, and good image stabilization, even if its predecessor’s variable aperture is missing and the default settings tend towards bright, vibrant images. Despite the EU downsizing, the 6,270 mAh battery offers excellent battery life and recharges quickly at up to 100 watts. Weaknesses such as the currently slow Wi-Fi 7 and the lack of a UWB chip detract slightly from the overall impression, but don’t diminish the Magic8 Pro’s status as a very attractive Android flagship.

    Pros

    + high-level performance

    + comprehensive IP certification

    + long-term update support

    + very good battery life

    + good camera setup

    + 3D face recognition and an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor

    Cons

    – no UWB

    – smaller battery in Europe

    – significant dip in performance under load

    – no barometer

    The Magic8 Pro has been available in Asia for some time (as we previously reported), and now it makes its appearance as the worldwide successor to the Magic7 Pro. Unfortunately, the European version comes with a significantly smaller battery and is also limited in terms of its storage options.

    Nevertheless, the battery is comparatively large and promises long battery life. In the UK, the smartphone is only available in the storage configuration reviewed here, and has a suggested retail price of around £1,049.

    Display

    6.71 inch 20:9, 2808 x 1256 pixel 458 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 4320Hz PWM Dimming, LTPO 1 – 120 Hz, NanoCrystal Shield, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

    Storage

    512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 

    , 484.39 GB free

    Connections

    1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, IR-Blaster

    Networking

    802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

    Size

    height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161.2 x 75 ( = 0.33 x 6.35 x 2.95 in)

    Battery

    6270 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode, two cells

    Charging

    wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

    Operating System

    Android 16

    Camera

    Primary Camera: 50 MPix (1/1.3″, f/1.6, 23 mm, OIS) + 200 MPix (3.7x optical zoom, 1/1.4″, f/2.6, 85 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, f/2.0, 12 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
    Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, 21 mm) + 3D Depth Camera

    Additional features

    Speakers: Dual, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, MagicOS 10, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3, LHDC 5.0, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B2a, B2b, B1C), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid | DRM Widevine L1 | up to 2 Nano-SIM, up to 2 eSIM | IP68 / / IP69 / IP69K | USB Copy Test: 395.9 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: 1.0 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.97 W/kg | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired) / 80 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof

    Weight

    219 g ( = 7.73 oz / 0.48 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

    Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

    Every color

    The Honor Magic8 Pro is available in black, Sunrise Gold, and Sky Cyan and has a nominal thickness of 8.3 mm (we measured 8.45 mm), or 14.4 mm including the camera. This makes it slightly slimmer than the previous model, the Magic7 Pro, when the camera is excluded, or up to 13.35 mm including the camera.

    The matte frame gives the Magic8 Pro a more premium look and makes it less prone to fingerprints. The build quality is impressive, with consistent and tight gaps between the components. When twisted, the smartphone only creaks slightly.

    The Magic8 Pro is IP69K certified, meaning it is dustproof and protected against immersion in water, steam, and high-pressure cleaning.

    163.33 mm / 6.43 in 77.82 mm / 3.06 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 220 g0.485 lbs162.7 mm / 6.41 in 77.1 mm / 3.04 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 223 g0.4916 lbs162.8 mm / 6.41 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 218 g0.4806 lbs161.98 mm / 6.38 in 75.48 mm / 2.97 in 7.99 mm / 0.3146 in 226 g0.4982 lbs161.2 mm / 6.35 in 75 mm / 2.95 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 219 g0.4828 lbs150 mm / 5.91 in 71.9 mm / 2.83 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 206 g0.4542 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

    The Magic8 Pro’s technical specifications are very similar to its predecessor: USB 3.2 with video output, an IR blaster, and Wi-Fi 7. Bluetooth has been updated to version 6.0 and now supports Auracast, which is something Honor refers to as “audio sharing” in the settings.

    However, UWB is still not on board.

    The Magic8 Pro ships with Google Android 16 and the MagicOS 10 user interface. Numerous AI features are also included, such as deepfake detection, and new for this year: AI agents.

    The security patches are up to date, and based on past experience, updates are usually distributed monthly during the first year, and quarterly thereafter. At times, the Magic7 Pro experienced even longer delays, but it also received the MagicOS 10 update shortly thereafter.

    The Honor smartphone comes in a slim, plastic-free outer box. However, the company has provided no information regarding its sustainability. In Europe, the Magic8 Pro will receive both security and version updates for seven years.

    User repair is not supported in case of damage.

    With Wi-Fi 7, the Magic8 Pro supports the most advanced Wi-Fi standard currently available, covering all three frequency bands. Paired with our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, data transfer speeds are stable but comparatively slow. Honor will likely address this issue with an update. If this is the case, we will provide updated measurements.

    The smartphone supports all of the modern mobile network standards with a wide range of frequencies.

    Networking
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    976 (min: 951) MBit/s ∼54%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    580 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼39%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    1856 (min: 1812) MBit/s ∼99%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    791 (min: 773) MBit/s ∼44%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    834 (min: 647) MBit/s ∼46%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    824 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼55%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    1667 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼89%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1216 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼67%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Wi-Fi 7
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼94%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼82%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    977 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼54%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    917 (min: 834) MBit/s ∼61%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    1866 (min: 1793) MBit/s ∼100%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1806 (min: 1725) MBit/s ∼100%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼55%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼63%

    Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
     
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000






    942 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000






    1051 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼70%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






    1280 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






    1447 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼80%

    Average of class Smartphone
     
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000






    706 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼39%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000






    730 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼49%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






    1303 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






    1379 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼76%

    050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip

    Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1856 (1812-1896)

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1667 (1563-1686)

    Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø790 (773-809)

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1215 (1179-1261)

    Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (951-1002)

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (647-963)

    Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (475-641)

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (780-864)

    Outdoors, the GPS fix is ​​quick and accurate. Indoors, however, the performance can be quite inaccurate and fluctuating.

    On a bike tour, we compared the Magic8 Pro with the Garmin Venu 2, with the smartphone tracking the route quite accurately, but not as precisely as the fitness smartwatch. For navigation purposes, however, this was perfectly adequate.

    The Honor Magic8 Pro can accommodate two nano-SIM cards or up to two eSIMs. The device supports standards such as Wi-Fi calling, VoLTE, and Vo5G.

    When held to the ear, the call quality is very natural, and even loud background noise is reliably eliminated. The speakerphone delivers good sound quality, but the microphone range could be somewhat better.

    full resolution]“>
    A selfie with the Honor Magic8 Pro

    The Honor Magic8 Pro’s front camera delivers high-resolution images, utilizes pixel binning, and employs a 3D depth sensor for focus assistance. This results in attractive selfies that boast a high level of detail and sharpness. Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 4K/60fps, but then appear somewhat over-processed. A reduced frame rate of 30fps allows for more detailed recordings.

    With the main camera, Honor has removed the variable aperture from the Magic7 Pro (f/1.4 – f/2.0), with the Magic8 Pro using a fixed aperture of f/1.6. What is new, however, is the optical image stabilization with CIPA 5.5, which we are already familiar with from Vivo X300 Pro. We have also conducted a photo comparison with both smartphones. 

    Our tests revealed impressive image quality, delivering attractive shots with a pleasing level of detail. However, the default settings result in images that are significantly brightened, and colors are oversaturated. Users who prefer a different look can adjust this in the settings.

    The ultra-wide-angle lens delivers acceptable results and also functions as a macro lens. However, the depth of field and detail towards the edges are somewhat soft.

    The optimized periscope zoom produces good photos that are sufficient for most needs, even in low light. A maximum magnification of 100x is achievable, which can be optionally enhanced by AI. This often works quite well with objects, but less so with people or more complex subjects.

    Videos are recorded in Ultra HD at up to 120fps and benefit from good image stabilization. We were also impressed with the recorded audio.

    Image comparison

    Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

    Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light

    click to load images

    6.2 ∆E

    5 ∆E

    8.9 ∆E

    5.9 ∆E

    6.3 ∆E

    3.1 ∆E

    3.8 ∆E

    7.6 ∆E

    7.3 ∆E

    8.2 ∆E

    1 ∆E

    3.9 ∆E

    7.4 ∆E

    3.8 ∆E

    3.8 ∆E

    2.4 ∆E

    6.9 ∆E

    8 ∆E

    4.6 ∆E

    3 ∆E

    3.5 ∆E

    7.8 ∆E

    7.8 ∆E

    6.7 ∆E

    ColorChecker Honor Magic8 Pro: 5.55 ∆E min: 0.99 – max: 8.94 ∆E

    18.6 ∆E

    23.3 ∆E

    22.7 ∆E

    20.9 ∆E

    26.5 ∆E

    31.1 ∆E

    23.7 ∆E

    19.6 ∆E

    19.2 ∆E

    21.9 ∆E

    29.4 ∆E

    31.1 ∆E

    17.4 ∆E

    26.5 ∆E

    16.7 ∆E

    28.3 ∆E

    23.7 ∆E

    25.2 ∆E

    28.4 ∆E

    28.5 ∆E

    31.7 ∆E

    24.5 ∆E

    18.6 ∆E

    11.6 ∆E

    ColorChecker Honor Magic8 Pro: 23.72 ∆E min: 11.65 – max: 31.71 ∆E

    The Honor Magic8 Pro only comes with a USB-C cable and a SIM card tool. Power adapters and protective cases must be purchased separately and can be found on various online stores such as Amazon. 

    The warranty in Germany covers 24 months.

    The Magic8 Pro’s capacitive touchscreen is smooth to the touch and offers precise input. An ultrasonic fingerprint sensor is integrated into the display, and it unlocks the smartphone quickly, boasting a high recognition rate. Additionally, the Honor smartphone remains the only one of its kind running Android to offer 3D face recognition, which is also speedy, accurate, and secure.

    The new AI button visually resembles the iPhone’s camera button, but its functionality also includes the iPhone’s action button, allowing it to distinguish between three different press gestures. Each of these can be assigned a different function. By default, a long press launches an AI overview, displaying the choice between AI reminders and Circle to Search. The latter can be accessed in a less cumbersome way, and it can be customized extensively in the settings.

    The linear vibration motor delivers crisp and, if desired, very distinct feedback.

    Subpixel structure

    The 6.71-inch (17.04 cm) OLED screen displays sharp images, supports all HDR standards, and can adjust the refresh rate between 1 and 120 Hz.

    The peak brightness of just over 6,000 cd/m² is achieved exclusively with HDR content, but even when it comes to smaller white areas (APL18: 3,233 cd/m²), the Magic8 Pro maintains high levels of brightness.

    High-frequency PWM dimming makes the panel a comparatively eye-friendly OLED among its peers. However, due to the 120 Hz base frequency, discomfort cannot be completely ruled out for users sensitive to such issues. Honor also includes numerous other features to protect the user’s eyes and can even counteract motion sickness.

    1863
    cd/m²
    1816
    cd/m²
    1789
    cd/m²
    1869
    cd/m²
    1809
    cd/m²
    1778
    cd/m²
    1858
    cd/m²
    1812
    cd/m²
    1793
    cd/m²

    Distribution of brightness

    tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

    Maximum: 1869 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1820.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.07 cd/m²
    Brightness Distribution: 95 %
    Center on Battery: 1809 cd/m²
    Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
    ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
    ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
    98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
    Gamma: 2.22
    CCT: 6446 K

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    OLED, 2808×1256, 6.7″
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    OLED, 2622×1206, 6.3″
    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120×1440, 6.9″
    Vivo X300 Pro
    AMOLED, 2800×1260, 6.8″
    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    AMOLED, 2608×1200, 6.9″
    Honor Magic7 Pro
    OLED, 2800×1280, 6.8″
    Screen

    -21%

    -49%

    -7%

    -4%

    8%

    Brightness middle (cd/m²)

    1809

    1059

    -41%

    1357

    -25%

    1574

    -13%

    1771

    -2%

    1607

    -11%

    Brightness (cd/m²)

    1821

    1060

    -42%

    1350

    -26%

    1562

    -14%

    1773

    -3%

    1609

    -12%

    Brightness Distribution (%)

    95

    99

    4%

    94

    -1%

    93

    -2%

    99

    4%

    95

    0%

    Black Level * (cd/m²)
    Colorchecker dE 2000 *

    1.2

    1.3

    -8%

    3.1

    -158%

    1.3

    -8%

    1.3

    -8%

    0.9

    25%

    Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

    2.9

    3.6

    -24%

    4.7

    -62%

    2.7

    7%

    2.8

    3%

    1.8

    38%

    Greyscale dE 2000 *

    1.8

    2.1

    -17%

    2.2

    -22%

    2

    -11%

    2.1

    -17%

    1.7

    6%

    Gamma

    2.22 99%

    2.2 100%

    2 110%

    2.26 97%

    2.25 98%

    2.24 98%

    CCT

    6446 101%

    6542 99%

    6391 102%

    6709 97%

    6452 101%

    6346 102%

    * … smaller is better

    Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    3519 cd/m² +9%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    3233 cd/m²

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    3044 cd/m² -6%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    2613 cd/m² -19%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    2329 cd/m² -28%

    Honor Magic7 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    1634 cd/m² -49%

    Display / HDR Peak Brightness
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    6045 cd/m²

    Honor Magic7 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    4697 cd/m² -22%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    3458 cd/m² -43%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    2997 cd/m² -50%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    2785 cd/m² -54%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    2768 cd/m² -54%

    Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

    ℹ

    To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

    Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
    Amplitude: 12.82 %
    Secondary Frequency: 4347 Hz

    The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

    The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

    In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8083 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

    A series of measurements with a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness appears flat, but this is due to the scaling. The enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness can be seen in the info box.)

    In our tests, we achieved the most natural color reproduction when the Professional color mode was selected together with the Warm color temperature setting. Although the Calman measurements were then slightly worse than with the predecessor, this difference was imperceptible to the naked eye.

    Display Response Times

    ℹ

    Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       ↔    Response Time Black to White
    1.04 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.5055 ms rise
    ↘ 0.536 ms fall
    The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
    In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
    This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
       ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
    0.63 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.324 ms rise
    ↘ 0.306 ms fall
    The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
    In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
    This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

    Outdoors, the Honor Magic8 Pro was very impressive and remained easily readable in all situations. The only thing missing is an anti-reflective screen.

    The panel’s viewing angle stability is excellent, and the brightness only dropped slightly at wide viewing angles.

    Das Honor Magic8 Pro is powered by the very up-to-date Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, which is responsible for excellent performance. The smartphone also delivers very good results in benchmarks in terms of peak performance. However, it is unable to maintain this level over the long term (see temperature).

    Geekbench 6.5
    Single-Core
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


    3803 Points +2%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    3718 Points

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    3676 Points -1%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (3498 – 3831, n=10)





    3669 Points -1%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    3562 Points -4%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    3200 Points -14%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (196 – 3883, n=214, last 2 years)





    1795 Points -52%

    Multi-Core
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    11301 Points

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (10620 – 12383, n=10)





    11182 Points -1%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    11004 Points -3%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    10615 Points -6%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


    10097 Points -11%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    10020 Points -11%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (830 – 11634, n=214, last 2 years)





    5255 Points -53%

    PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    22179 Points

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (18445 – 28557, n=8)





    20978 Points -5%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    20764 Points -6%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    18445 Points -17%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    17480 Points -21%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (4507 – 28557, n=186, last 2 years)





    14942 Points -33%

    CrossMark – Overall
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    2722 Points

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    2598 Points -5%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    2354 Points -14%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (1698 – 2722, n=7)





    2310 Points -15%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (187 – 2722, n=122, last 2 years)





    1175 Points -57%

    BaseMark OS II
    Overall
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    15734 Points

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    14678 Points -7%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (7945 – 16690, n=9)





    13739 Points -13%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    13325 Points -15%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    10620 Points -33%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (1196 – 16690, n=150, last 2 years)





    7853 Points -50%

    System
    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    20996 Points +4%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    20150 Points

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (9356 – 21153, n=9)





    18668 Points -7%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    17171 Points -15%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    15639 Points -22%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (2368 – 21153, n=150, last 2 years)





    11617 Points -42%

    Memory
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    22887 Points

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    18501 Points -19%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    17355 Points -24%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (6789 – 24052, n=9)





    17053 Points -25%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    13155 Points -43%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (962 – 24052, n=150, last 2 years)





    8952 Points -61%

    Graphics
    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (41267 – 61797, n=9)





    52025 Points +1%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    51530 Points 0%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    51366 Points

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    45562 Points -11%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    26660 Points -48%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (1046 – 384996, n=150, last 2 years)





    26630 Points -48%

    Web
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    2587 Points

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    2322 Points -10%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    2319 Points -10%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    2319 Points -10%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (1561 – 2587, n=9)





    2239 Points -13%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (858 – 2587, n=150, last 2 years)





    1720 Points -34%

    Geekbench AI
    Single Precision NPU 1.5
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


    5143 Points +510%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    843 Points

    Average of class Smartphone
      (80 – 5210, n=64, last 2 years)





    777 Points -8%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    733 Points -13%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (511 – 843, n=9)





    639 Points -24%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    559 Points -34%

    Half Precision NPU 1.5
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


    35890 Points +4157%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (80 – 36297, n=64, last 2 years)





    3234 Points +284%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    843 Points

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    718 Points -15%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (486 – 843, n=9)





    617 Points -27%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    561 Points -33%

    Quantized NPU 1.5
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


    49889 Points +2412%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (133 – 49889, n=64, last 2 years)





    4710 Points +137%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    1986 Points

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    1631 Points -18%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (974 – 1986, n=9)





    1350 Points -32%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    1285 Points -35%

    AI Benchmark – Score V6
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


    22780 Points

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


    21660 Points -5%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


    19229 Points -16%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
      (1098 – 22780, n=6)





    15134 Points -34%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    10621 Points -53%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (55.6 – 22780, n=77, last 2 years)





    5293 Points -77%

    Die Adreno 840 liefert Grafikpower pur, unterstützt Raytracing und zeigt im Test Spitzenergebnisse.

    3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    8102 Points

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    7629 Points -6%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    6959 Points -14%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    6907 Points -15%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    5928 Points -27%

    3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    8072 Points

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    7582 Points -6%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    7021 Points -13%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    6845 Points -15%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    6001 Points -26%

    3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    30621 Points +2%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    30166 Points

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    26944 Points -11%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    26614 Points -12%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    26286 Points -13%

    3DMark / Solar Bay Score
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    14869 Points +5%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    14225 Points

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    13036 Points -8%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    12395 Points -13%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    11442 Points -20%

    3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    15420 Points +8%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    14331 Points

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    12711 Points -11%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    12242 Points -15%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    12194 Points -15%

    3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    3208 Points +4%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    3081 Points

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    2704 Points -12%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    2630 Points -15%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    2397 Points -22%

    3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    3253 Points +5%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    3101 Points

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    2736 Points -12%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    2698 Points -13%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    2651 Points -15%

    GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    121 fps +1%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    60 fps -50%

    GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    937 fps +2%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    917 fps

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    754 fps -18%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    713 fps -22%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    579 fps -37%

    GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    121 fps +1%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    60 fps -50%

    GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    531 fps

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    472 fps -11%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    441 fps -17%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    415 fps -22%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    341 fps -36%

    GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    121 fps +1%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    60 fps -50%

    GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    399 fps

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    346 fps -13%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    343 fps -14%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    286 fps -28%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    284 fps -29%

    GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    121 fps +1%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    104 fps -13%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    60 fps -50%

    GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    239 fps

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    210 fps -12%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    198 fps -17%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    193 fps -19%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    161 fps -33%

    GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    121 fps +1%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    100 fps -17%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    60 fps -50%

    GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    127 fps

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps -6%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    114 fps -10%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    107 fps -16%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    87 fps -31%

    GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    60 fps -50%

    GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    367 fps +2%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    361 fps

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    296 fps -18%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    253 fps -30%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    237 fps -34%

    GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    62 fps +7%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    58 fps

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    52 fps -10%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    50 fps -14%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    37 fps -36%

    Jetstream 2 – 2.2 Total Score
    Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)


    479.804 Points

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)


    469.169 Points -2%

    Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)


    362.318 Points -24%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 – 480, n=5)





    265 Points -45%

    Average of class Smartphone (2 – 480, n=52, last 2 years)





    224 Points -53%

    WebXPRT 4 – Overall
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)


    302 Points +40%

    Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)


    255 Points +18%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)


    236 Points +9%

    Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)


    216 Points

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 – 278, n=7)





    171.3 Points -21%

    Average of class Smartphone (27 – 306, n=144, last 2 years)





    147.2 Points -32%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)


    124 Points -43%

    Octane V2 – Total Score
    Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)


    126661 Points

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)


    119218 Points -6%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)


    99202 Points -22%

    Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)


    96438 Points -24%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 – 126661, n=7)





    84253 Points -33%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)


    58421 Points -54%

    Average of class Smartphone (2228 – 126661, n=195, last 2 years)





    49588 Points -61%

    Mozilla Kraken 1.1 – Total
    Average of class Smartphone (257 – 28190, n=155, last 2 years)





    1141 ms * -301%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)


    522.8 ms * -84%

    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 – 635, n=8)





    421 ms * -48%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)


    376.8 ms * -32%

    Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)


    373.8 ms * -31%

    Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)


    284.4 ms *

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)


    270.4 ms * +5%

    * … smaller is better

    Honor Magic8 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Vivo X300 Pro Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Honor Magic7 Pro Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash Average of class Smartphone
    AndroBench 3-5

    -25%

    -32%

    6%

    -21%

    -15%

    -43%

    Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)

    3942.69

    3823.28

    -3%

    2041.82

    -48%

    4064.33

    3%

    3910.81

    -1%

    3708 1954 – 4110, n=27)

    -6%

    2248 270 – 4370, n=198, last 2 years)

    -43%

    Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)

    3732.81

    3361.24

    -10%

    1981.85

    -47%

    3987.65

    7%

    3683.81

    -1%

    3234 1240 – 4035, n=27)

    -13%

    1887 103.2 – 4051, n=198, last 2 years)

    -49%

    Random Read 4KB (MB/s)

    488.67

    287.85

    -41%

    320.25

    -34%

    575.86

    18%

    282.34

    -42%

    393 279 – 576, n=27)

    -20%

    299 47.6 – 576, n=198, last 2 years)

    -39%

    Random Write 4KB (MB/s)

    587.11

    331.61

    -44%

    593.74

    1%

    551.82

    -6%

    357.04

    -39%

    456 48.2 – 689, n=27)

    -22%

    346 9.4 – 987, n=198, last 2 years)

    -41%

    The Magic8 Pro’s surface temperatures remain safe at all times, even under sustained load, and don’t even reach 44 °C in some areas.

    The SoC’s cooling system struggled to cope with the heat generated during stress tests, which resulted in a performance loss of approximately 50%.

      42.1 °C
    108 F
    42.6 °C
    109 F
    42.1 °C
    108 F
     
      40.2 °C
    104 F
    42.4 °C
    108 F
    42 °C
    108 F
     
      38.2 °C
    101 F
    41.8 °C
    107 F
    39.3 °C
    103 F
     
    Maximum: 42.6 °C = 109 F
    Average: 41.2 °C = 106 F
    39.7 °C
    103 F
    41 °C
    106 F
    43.2 °C
    110 F
    38.5 °C
    101 F
    40.2 °C
    104 F
    40.8 °C
    105 F
    38.4 °C
    101 F
    39.8 °C
    104 F
    39.4 °C
    103 F
    Maximum: 43.2 °C = 110 F
    Average: 40.1 °C = 104 F

    Room Temperature 20.6 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

    (-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
    (±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
    (±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
    (+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

    3DMark
    Wild Life Stress Test Stability
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    99.7 % +99%

    Honor Magic7 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    57.6 % +15%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    54.9 % +10%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    52.3 % +5%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    50 %

    Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    73.5 % +45%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    52.3 % +3%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    50.7 %

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    50.3 % -1%

    Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    76.8 % +49%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    51.6 %

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    49.7 % -4%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    49.5 % -4%

    Honor Magic7 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    % -100%

    Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
    Honor Magic7 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    68.4 % +41%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


    65.8 % +36%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    50.6 % +5%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    48.4 %

    Vivo X300 Pro
    Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    47 % -3%

    0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip

    Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.9 (22-43.5)

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.2 (26.9-36.7)

    Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø27.3 (21.9-43.5)

    Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø98.4 (78.1-156.3)

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (59.8-60)

    Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø88.6 (69.3-132.4)

    Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14.1 (10.3-21.3)

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (13.4-20.4)

    Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14 (11-23.3)

    Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø30 (21.5-41.7)

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø33.4 (31-40.3)

    Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø29.1 (23.9-48.2)

    The Honor smartphone’s two speakers’ main aim is to deliver a spatial sound experience with plenty of depth using AI algorithms. At medium volume, they’re quite successful in achieving this goal, and the result is an appealing sound stage. However, at full volume, the treble distorts quite noticeably at times.

    dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.838.92529.6323119.342.14025.3415033.341.86320.748.48023.849.610018.448.812515.25216011.956.62001557.125011.758.231511.762.440010.164.45009.871.163010.872.880011.376.7100011.379.5125012.382.9160011.778.4200011.382.225001282.7315012.283400012.885500013.182.4630013.380.3800013.376.71000013.476.51250013.368.11600012.962.7SPL24.493.1N0.598median 12.2median 76.7Delta1.39.736.941.135.428.527.523.228.430.629.839.423.227.519.53619.445.620.150.917.660.618.457.515.557.912.75811.461.612.965.311.765.511.369.312.274.213.174.915.176.113.179.81379.413.376.713.378.113.377.313.676.413.673.513.67713.771.91459.125.488.40.774.6median 13.3median 73.51.18hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

    The Magic8 Pro’s power consumption is comparatively low, which, when paired with its 6,270 mAh battery, should promise excellent battery life. Unfortunately, the battery in the European version is smaller; the Chinese version boasts a 7,200 mAh battery and faster charging capabilities.

    Wired charging in the reviewed version is possible at up to 100 watts, with a full charge taking 36 minutes (50%: 14 minutes).

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    6270 mAh
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    3988 mAh
    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    5000 mAh
    Vivo X300 Pro
    5440 mAh
    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    6500 mAh
    Honor Magic7 Pro
    5270 mAh
    Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
     
    Average of class Smartphone
     
    Power Consumption

    -70%

    -17%

    -84%

    -31%

    -54%

    -34%

    -43%

    Idle Minimum * (Watt)

    0.58

    0.56

    3%

    0.55

    5%

    0.86

    -48%

    0.87

    -50%

    0.94

    -62%

    0.798 0.58 – 1.2, n=8)

    -38%

    0.847 0.4 – 1.65, n=164, last 2 years)

    -46%

    Idle Average * (Watt)

    0.74

    1.78

    -141%

    0.77

    -4%

    1.8

    -143%

    1.29

    -74%

    1.5

    -103%

    1.283 0.74 – 2.13, n=8)

    -73%

    1.446 0.6 – 4.36, n=164, last 2 years)

    -95%

    Idle Maximum * (Watt)

    0.75

    1.89

    -152%

    0.91

    -21%

    1.86

    -148%

    1.33

    -77%

    1.57

    -109%

    1.52 0.75 – 2.18, n=8)

    -103%

    1.63 0.75 – 4.46, n=164, last 2 years)

    -117%

    Load Average * (Watt)

    11.35

    12.36

    -9%

    13.81

    -22%

    10.63

    6%

    8.84

    22%

    11.03

    3%

    7.08 4.2 – 11.4, n=7)

    38%

    6.95 2.3 – 15.4, n=140, last 2 years)

    39%

    Load Maximum * (Watt)

    11.87

    17.69

    -49%

    16.69

    -41%

    21.99

    -85%

    9.15

    23%

    11.68

    2%

    11.2 8.9 – 15.3, n=7)

    6%

    11.3 3.53 – 22, n=140, last 2 years)

    5%

    * … smaller is better

    01234567891011Tooltip

    Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.54 (0.614-11.8)

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.37 (0.963-9.17)

    Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.557 (0.4958-0.791)

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)

    01234567891011Tooltip

    Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (11.5-11.9)

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.08 (9.02-9.14)

    Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.557 (0.4958-0.791)

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)

    The Honor Magic 8 Pro achieved very good battery runtimes in the battery test.

    Battery Runtime

    WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 143) 26h 52min
    Review: Honor Magic8 Pro

    The Honor Magic8 Pro presents itself as a worthy successor with a brighter OLED display, strong performance and lengthy software support, but in Europe, you’ll have to accept compromises in battery size and storage options.

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    – 01/13/2026 v8

    Daniel Schmidt

    Connectivity

    68 / 69 → 98%

    Games Performance

    40 / 55 → 72%

    Application Performance

    89 / 85 → 100%

    Smartphone – Weighted Average

    CO2 Emissions
    No Data

    Materials
    25%

    Packaging
    75%

    Power Use
    92.4%

    Repairability
    20%

    Software Updates
    100%

    Total Sustainability Score: 52.1%

    Image

    Model / Review

    Price

    Weight

    Drive

    Display

    1.

    89.3%

    Honor Magic8 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
    Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
    12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $8.99
    Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible …
    2. $11.88
    [5 Pack] Screen Protector fo…
    3. $6.87
    GUYAHANYER 3-Pack Screen Pro…
    List Price: 1300€
    219 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.71″
    2808×1256
    458 PPI
    OLED

    2.

    89.9%

    Apple iPhone 17 Pro
    Apple A19 Pro ⎘
    Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘
    12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
    Amazon:
    1. $48.99
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone…
    2. $49.00
    Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone…
    3. $9.89
    Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto…
    List Price: 1549€
    206 g Apple 512GB NVMe 6.30″
    2622×1206
    458 PPI
    OLED

    3.

    89.4%

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
    Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
    12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. 
    Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25…
    2. $1,154.50
    Samsung Galaxy ​S25 Ultra …
    3. $1,299.99
    SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-…
    List Price: 1449€
    218 g 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.90″
    3120×1440
    498 PPI
    Dynamic AMOLED 2X

    4.

    88.1%

    Vivo X300 Pro
    MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
    Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $11.99
    MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V…
    2. $7.99
    Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible …
    3. $9.91
    MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V…
    List Price: 1399€
    226 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.78″
    2800×1260
    453 PPI
    AMOLED

    5.

    88.2%

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
    Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $10.79
    Ibywind for Xiaomi Poco F8 U…
    2. $8.99
    Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 U…
    3. $12.99
    Suttkue for POCO F8 Ultra Sc…
    List Price: 900€
    220 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.90″
    2608×1200
    416 PPI
    AMOLED

    Transparency

    The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

    This is how Notebookcheck is testing

    Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

    Editor of the original article: Daniel Schmidt – Managing Editor Mobile – 815 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

    As a child I was fascinated by my Commodore 16, and this sparked my enthusiasm for computers. Using my first modem, I surfed the BTX videotext system and later the World Wide Web. I have always been captivated by the latest technologies, and this is especially true for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. I’ve been part of the Notebookcheck team since 2013 and have also on occasion written for Notebookinfo.de, and I’m looking forward to testing new innovations for our readers. I like to spend my spare time indulging in photography and barbecues and being with my family.

    Translator: Andrew Dickson – Translator – 173 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

    My lifelong passion for tech was born in a gadget-filled household in Scotland. From games consoles to cameras to computers. Early adopters, so early the phrase might have been coined with our family in mind.
    On finishing school, I trained and qualified as a golf professional before moving to Germany, where I have worked and lived for over 30 years.
    In 2002, I formed a successful English language centre, providing training, translations and digital learning systems to numerous businesses in the Rhein Neckar metropole area.
    Whether augmented or virtual reality, smart devices, mobile technology, sustainable environmental solutions, the tech world is as exciting now as it has ever been.
    Working with Notebookcheck allows me to combine my love of both tech and language.

    Daniel Schmidt, 2026-01-15 (Update: 2026-01-15)

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleApple iPhone 18 Pro: Render video reveals all new features in three colors
    Next Article Civilization VII coming to iPhone and iPad
    TechAiVerse
    • Website

    Jonathan is a tech enthusiast and the mind behind Tech AI Verse. With a passion for artificial intelligence, consumer tech, and emerging innovations, he deliver clear, insightful content to keep readers informed. From cutting-edge gadgets to AI advancements and cryptocurrency trends, Jonathan breaks down complex topics to make technology accessible to all.

    Related Posts

    ARC Raiders dev claims they built an auction house-like trading system for the game but later removed it as it’s “very risky territory”

    January 17, 2026

    Citizen unveils 3 new tachymeter bezel chronographs with 43 mm stainless-steel cases

    January 17, 2026

    Portable 27-inch monitor with Google TV, battery and built-in soundbar launches with discount

    January 17, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Ping, You’ve Got Whale: AI detection system alerts ships of whales in their path

    April 22, 2025619 Views

    Lumo vs. Duck AI: Which AI is Better for Your Privacy?

    July 31, 2025235 Views

    6.7 Cummins Lifter Failure: What Years Are Affected (And Possible Fixes)

    April 14, 2025135 Views

    6 Best MagSafe Phone Grips (2025), Tested and Reviewed

    April 6, 2025109 Views
    Don't Miss
    Technology January 17, 2026

    ARC Raiders dev claims they built an auction house-like trading system for the game but later removed it as it’s “very risky territory”

    ARC Raiders dev claims they built an auction house-like trading system for the game but…

    Citizen unveils 3 new tachymeter bezel chronographs with 43 mm stainless-steel cases

    Portable 27-inch monitor with Google TV, battery and built-in soundbar launches with discount

    Civilization VII coming to iPhone and iPad

    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    About Us
    About Us

    Welcome to Tech AI Verse, your go-to destination for everything technology! We bring you the latest news, trends, and insights from the ever-evolving world of tech. Our coverage spans across global technology industry updates, artificial intelligence advancements, machine learning ethics, and automation innovations. Stay connected with us as we explore the limitless possibilities of technology!

    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    ARC Raiders dev claims they built an auction house-like trading system for the game but later removed it as it’s “very risky territory”

    January 17, 20260 Views

    Citizen unveils 3 new tachymeter bezel chronographs with 43 mm stainless-steel cases

    January 17, 20260 Views

    Portable 27-inch monitor with Google TV, battery and built-in soundbar launches with discount

    January 17, 20260 Views
    Most Popular

    A Team of Female Founders Is Launching Cloud Security Tech That Could Overhaul AI Protection

    March 12, 20250 Views

    Senua’s Saga: Hellblade 2 leads BAFTA Game Awards 2025 nominations

    March 12, 20250 Views

    7 Best Kids Bikes (2025): Mountain, Balance, Pedal, Coaster

    March 13, 20250 Views
    © 2026 TechAiVerse. Designed by Divya Tech.
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.