Want smarter insights in your inbox? Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get only what matters to enterprise AI, data, and security leaders. Subscribe Now

He added that the Action Plan “is not a blueprint for enterprise AI.” Still, enterprises should expect an AI development environment that prioritizes speed, scale, experimentation and less reliance on regulatory shelters. Companies working with the government should also be prepared for additional scrutiny on the models and applications they use, to ensure alignment with the government’s values. 

The Action Plan outlines how government agencies can collaborate with AI companies, prioritize recommended tasks to invest in infrastructure and encourage AI development and establish guidelines for exporting and importing AI tools. 

Charleyne Biondi, assistant vice president and analyst at Moody’s Ratings, said the plan “highlights AI’s role as an increasingly strategic asset and core driver of economic transformation.” She noted, however, that that plan doesn’t address regulatory fragmentation.

“However, current regulatory fragmentation across U.S. states could create uncertainty for developers and businesses. Striking the right balance between innovation and safety and between national ambition and regulatory clarity will be critical to ensure continued enterprise adoption and avoid unintended slowdowns,” she said. 

What is inside the action plan

The AI Action Plan is broken down into three pillars:

1. Accelerating AI innovation
2. Building American AI infrastructure
3. Leading in international AI diplomacy and security. 

The key headline piece of the AI Action Plan centers on “ensuring free speech and American values,” a significant talking point for this administration. It instructs the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to remove references to misinformation and diversity, equity and inclusion. It prevents agencies from working with foundation models that have “top-down agendas.” 

It’s unclear how the government expects existing models and datasets to follow suit, or what this kind of AI would look like. Enterprises are especially concerned about potentially controversial statements AI systems can make, as evidenced by the recent Grok kerfuffle.  

It also orders NIST to research and publish findings to ensure that models from China, such as DeepSeek, Qwen and Kimi, are not aligned with the Chinese Communist Party.

However, the most consequential positions involve supporting open-source systems, creating a new testing and evaluation ecosystem, and streamlining the process for building data centers. 

Through the plan, the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation are directed to develop “AI testbeds for piloting AI systems in secure, real-world settings,” allowing researchers to prototype systems. It also removes much of the red tape associated with evaluating safety testing for models. 

What has excited many in the industry is the explicit support for open-source AI and open-weight models. 

“We need to ensure America has leading open models founded on American values. Open-source and open-weight models could become global standards in some areas of business and academic research worldwide. For that reason, they also have geostrategic value. While the decision of whether and how to release an open or closed model is fundamentally up to the developer, the Federal government should create a supportive environment for open models,” the plan said. 

Understandably, open-source proponents like Hugging Face’s Clement Delangue praised this decision on social media, saying: “It’s time for the American AI community to wake up, drop the “open is not safe” bullshit, and return to its roots: open science and open-source AI, powered by an unmatched community of frontier labs, big tech, startups, universities, and non‑profits.”

BCG X North America chair Sesh Iyer told VentureBeat this would give enterprises more confidence in adopting open-source LLMs and could also encourage more closed-source providers “to rethink proprietary strategies and potentially consider releasing model weights.”

The plan does mention that cloud providers should prioritize the Department of Defense, which could bump some enterprises down an already crowded waiting list. 

A little more clarity on rules

The AI Action Plan is more akin to an executive order and can only direct government agencies under the purview of the Executive branch. Full AI regulation, one that endures through multiple administrations, can only be achieved through Congress. 

Enterprises understood that the change in administration may mean less emphasis on AI regulations, and braced themselves for that impact. The Trump administration revoked Biden’s EO, halting many of the projects already underway after it was signed. 

With the signing of the Action Plan, the Trump administration at least lays out its priorities and stance on AI development, which would help increase enterprise confidence in the technology. 

However, even in the absence of an EO or Congress-led regulation, enterprises were already building and expanding the AI ecosystem. Although there is some concern over the lack of rules and the uncertainty that comes with it, it was never going to stop businesses from being excited about a technology that promises to make their work easier. The plan, at least, makes it easier to grow more. 

“It lowers some external friction, like faster permits, more data center capacity, and potential funding. But real acceleration happens inside the enterprise: skills, governance, and the ability to deploy responsibly. Those who’ve already built that muscle will be best positioned to capitalize on the momentum the plan generates,” PwC’s Wood said.