The announcement of Twenty One Capital’s formation last month was met with mixed reactions. While some saw it as another massive step toward institutional adoption, others grew weary that Bitcoin might fall victim to “Wall Streetization.”

To better understand the reasons for optimism and apprehension surrounding Twenty One Capital’s launch, BeInCrypto consulted with Matt Mena, a researcher at 21Shares, and Mati Greenspan, CEO of Quantum Economics.

Public Bitcoin Giant Emerges Amidst Mixed Reactions

The unveiling of Twenty One Capital notably surprised both the TradFi and crypto space. This ambitious Bitcoin-native company, backed by industry giants and high-profile crypto enthusiasts, immediately became a focal point of intense discussion and speculation.

Spearheading this new venture is Jack Mallers, the well-known Bitcoin advocate and CEO of Strike. He will reportedly lead Twenty One as its CEO.

Also, the company boasts significant financial backing from USDT issuer Tether and SoftBank Group, a global investment powerhouse. 

Twenty One Capital is structured as a publicly traded entity through a business combination with Cantor Equity Partners. The company is expected to launch with a substantial Bitcoin treasury exceeding 42,000 BTC. 

Its stated mission includes maximizing Bitcoin ownership per share, advocating for Bitcoin adoption, producing related content, and exploring the development of future Bitcoin-native financial products.

This news sparked a nuanced response, with excitement about Bitcoin becoming more mainstream alongside concerns about how institutional involvement might affect an asset designed to challenge traditional finance.

Institutionalizing Bitcoin: Opening Doors to Wider Investment

For those loyal advocates of Bitcoin’s potential from the beginning, the formation of Twenty One Capital solidified their conviction that Bitcoin has finally achieved a new level of mainstream validation.

Major players like SoftBank and Tether’s backing indicate growing confidence in Bitcoin as a legitimate asset class. Some also see creating a publicly traded company solely dedicated to Bitcoin further solidifying its market position.

“The launch of 21 Capital doesn’t change Bitcoin’s core architecture or ethos– but it does highlight how institutional investors, such as Cantor Fitzgerald and SoftBank, who together manage hundreds of billions of dollars, are increasingly recognizing Bitcoin’s value as a neutral, non-sovereign asset in today’s shifting financial landscape,” Matt Mena, crypto researcher at 21Shares, told BeInCrypto. 

By institutionalizing Bitcoin, Twenty One Capital would also open the asset to a broader class of investors.

Increased Liquidity and Access

Crypto advocates have consistently welcomed steps bringing digital assets closer to mainstream investors. 

Last year’s approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) marked a significant initial move in this direction. This development allowed traditional traders to gain portfolio exposure to these alternative assets without directly holding them.

The launch of Twenty One Capital will likely have a comparable impact. Establishing a large Bitcoin treasury within a publicly traded vehicle will increase liquidity and give traditional investors a more accessible route to Bitcoin exposure.

Meanwhile, unlike firms that just allocate a portion of their assets to Bitcoin, Twenty One Capital’s entire purpose revolves around Bitcoin. This commitment could pave the way for developments contributing to the Bitcoin ecosystem’s growth and health.

“Investment vehicles like 21 Capital, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), and the ETF wrapper arguably further Bitcoin’s original vision by democratizing access to finance. They help make Bitcoin exposure available to a broader base of investors—from institutions to everyday savers—without requiring direct crypto custody or technical knowledge,” Mena said.

Despite these arguments’ merit, Tether and SoftBank’s significant backing presents several potential dangers.

Bitcoin’s Decentralized Traits are Inherent

When questioned about Twenty One Capital’s potential negative impacts on the Bitcoin network, Mena made a critical distinction between two key aspects.

He clarified that Twenty One Capital would be a service built on top of the Bitcoin network. As such, any centralization within their operations wouldn’t change the underlying decentralized nature of the Bitcoin protocol. Individuals would still be free to interact with Bitcoin directly, peer-to-peer.

“It’s important, though, not to conflate institutional participation with control. Bitcoin remains decentralized– open, permissionless, and secured by a globally distributed network of miners and nodes. Entities like 21 Capital don’t alter the protocol or centralize the asset– they simply offer new access points that integrate Bitcoin into existing financial infrastructure,” Mena told BeInCrypto. 

But, despite this reality, a single entity with a corporate treasury of over 42,000 BTC would inevitably inherit significant influence over a market with a self-limiting supply of Bitcoin. 

The Feedback Loop: Funding Further Bitcoin Purchases

Since Twenty One Capital is solely centered on Bitcoin, its stock price will likely be tightly linked to its value and its ability to increase its holdings per share.

If Bitcoin’s price rises and the company is seen as effectively increasing its BPS, its stock price could appreciate. This higher valuation in the public markets gives Twenty One Capital several advantages.

A higher stock price makes it easier and more attractive for Twenty One Capital to raise additional capital through equity offerings, debt financing, or convertible notes. 

With newly acquired capital, Twenty One Capital’s core strategy, as stated in their announcement, is to “strategically allocate capital to increase Bitcoin per share.” This intention directly translates to using the raised funds to purchase more Bitcoin.

As Twenty One Capital accumulates Bitcoin, it could exert upward pressure on its price, increasing the value of existing holdings. This appreciation could further enhance the company’s stock price and investor appeal.

Consequently, this would make future capital raises more effective, creating a positive feedback loop for the company.

This cycle could result in one publicly traded company controlling a substantial portion of Bitcoin’s limited supply. This prospect has resulted in unease within parts of the community.

Is Bitcoin’s Distributed Vision at Odds with Corporate Accumulation?

The core tenet of Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin vision was broad ownership distribution to avoid centralized control. This concept is at odds with a company like Twenty One Capital amassing a substantial portion of the supply.

This considerable ownership could introduce market instability that harms smaller participants and deviates from the aim of a distributed digital currency. This degree of institutionalization has consequently raised fears of turning Bitcoin into just another Wall Street asset. 

This development could diminish the ideal of individual financial autonomy.

Mati Greenspan, CEO of Quantum Economics, reiterated core Bitcoin principles in light of this threat. He emphasized Bitcoin’s original creation as a fundamental means to eliminate intermediaries from financial processes.

“It’s honestly baffling to me how guys like Jack Mallers and Michael Saylor can so brilliantly explain why Bitcoin is the most superior asset ever created, and then use that same explanation to try and sell you a stock. Personally? No thanks. I’ll stick with the actual asset they so eloquently shilled,” Greenspan told BeInCrypto.

For now, the outcome of this situation remains quite nuanced and unpredictable.

Navigating the Divide

Ultimately, Twenty One Capital’s impact will likely be a complex balancing act. Its efforts could bring more mainstream legitimacy and investment to Bitcoin, potentially accelerating its adoption as a global digital asset. 

However, its significant institutional backing also carries the risk of prioritizing shareholder interests over Bitcoin’s original decentralized vision.

The key will be to observe how Twenty One Capital operates, the types of products it develops, and how its activities support or potentially compromise Bitcoin’s core principles of decentralization and peer-to-peer nature. 

The roles of the Bitcoin community and regulators will be crucial in shaping this trajectory.