Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Spotify’s new feature makes it easier to find popular audiobooks

    This portable JBL Grip Bluetooth speaker is so good at 20% off

    ‘AI’ could dox your anonymous posts

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Business Technology
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Gadgets
    • Gaming
    • Health
    • Software and Apps
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    Tech AI Verse
    • Home
    • Artificial Intelligence

      What the polls say about how Americans are using AI

      February 27, 2026

      Tensions between the Pentagon and AI giant Anthropic reach a boiling point

      February 21, 2026

      Read the extended transcript: President Donald Trump interviewed by ‘NBC Nightly News’ anchor Tom Llamas

      February 6, 2026

      Stocks and bitcoin sink as investors dump software company shares

      February 4, 2026

      AI, crypto and Trump super PACs stash millions to spend on the midterms

      February 2, 2026
    • Business

      Weighing up the enterprise risks of neocloud providers

      March 3, 2026

      A stolen Gemini API key turned a $180 bill into $82,000 in two days

      March 3, 2026

      These ultra-budget laptops “include” 1.2TB storage, but most of it is OneDrive trial space

      March 1, 2026

      FCC approves the merger of cable giants Cox and Charter

      February 28, 2026

      Finding value with AI and Industry 5.0 transformation

      February 28, 2026
    • Crypto

      Strait of Hormuz Shutdown Shakes Asian Energy Markets

      March 3, 2026

      Wall Street’s Inflation Alarm From Iran — What It Means for Crypto

      March 3, 2026

      Ethereum Price Prediction: What To Expect From ETH In March 2026

      March 3, 2026

      Was Bitcoin Hijacked? How Institutional Interests Shaped Its Narrative Since 2015

      March 3, 2026

      XRP Whales Now Hold 83.7% of All Supply – What’s Next For Price?

      March 3, 2026
    • Technology

      Spotify’s new feature makes it easier to find popular audiobooks

      March 3, 2026

      This portable JBL Grip Bluetooth speaker is so good at 20% off

      March 3, 2026

      ‘AI’ could dox your anonymous posts

      March 3, 2026

      Microsoft says new Teams location feature isn’t for ’employee tracking’

      March 3, 2026

      OpenAI got ‘sloppy’ about the wrong thing

      March 3, 2026
    • Others
      • Gadgets
      • Gaming
      • Health
      • Software and Apps
    Check BMI
    Tech AI Verse
    You are at:Home»Technology»Xiaomi 15S Pro review: Newfound independence and strong battery life in a flagship smartphone
    Technology

    Xiaomi 15S Pro review: Newfound independence and strong battery life in a flagship smartphone

    TechAiVerseBy TechAiVerseJuly 3, 2025No Comments39 Mins Read2 Views
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    Xiaomi 15S Pro review: Newfound independence and strong battery life in a flagship smartphone
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    Xiaomi 15S Pro review: Newfound independence and strong battery life in a flagship smartphone – NotebookCheck.net Reviews

    The Xiaomi 15S Pro offers a similarly strong overall package as the Pro model. This is hardly surprising, as everything apart from the chipset remains the same. In its effort to become more independent and to offer all components in-house, Xiaomi is on a very promising path with its XRing O1. Considering Google’s work with its Tensor series, Xiaomi’s SoC debut is genuinely remarkable. While the 15S Pro with the XRing O1 is slightly less powerful than the 15 Pro with the Snapdragon 8 Elite, it offers more consistent performance overall.

    Anyone willing to accept compromises in update support and availability will get a great smartphone with solid hardware. However, we see no clear reason to choose the 15S Pro over the Xiaomi 15 Pro.

    Pros

    + long battery life

    + premium look and feel

    + powerful SoC

    + fast charging

    + bright 1,440p display

    Cons

    – limited availability (no eSIM etc.)

    – no guaranteed software updates

    – high thermal output

    The Xiaomi 15S Pro is currently available exclusively on the Chinese market. The standard configuration, which includes 16 GB of LPDDR5T RAM and 512 GB of UFS 4.1 storage, is priced at ¥5,499 (approximately €680 or $765 USD).

    At our loan partner Trading Shenzhen, prices start at around €700, or roughly $820 USD. It remains unclear whether this new flagship phone will be officially released in Europe or the United States.

    $7.99

    Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible with Xiaomi 15S Pro Screen Protector Tempered Glass, Case Friendly [Hardness 9H ][High definition] [Anti Scratch]

    • $16.79

      Bruni Screen Protector compatible with Xiaomi 15S Pro Protector Film, crystal clear Protective Film (2X)

    • $10.32

      HGJTFANY [4 Pcs Screen Protector for Xiaomi 15S Pro (6.73 Inch), 9H Hardness Tempered Glass Screen Film, Highly Clear, Anti-Scratch, Bubble Free, for Xiaomi 15S Pro Protective Film

    The Xiaomi 15S Pro is a new variant of the existing Pro model, but aside from the new processor and an optional carbon look, it remains largely unchanged. According to Xiaomi, the textured surface is intended to resemble dragon scales, or at least that is what the name implies. While the 15 Pro is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, the S version in the 15 series uses Xiaomi’s own XRing O1 chip.

    Display

    6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LTPO, 1920Hz PWM, HDR, 120 Hz

    Storage

    512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 

    , 479 GB free

    Connections

    1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, UWB, OTG, Miracast

    Networking

    802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G:n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n20 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n79; 4G:FDD-LTE:B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28 / B66 TDD-LTE:B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48; 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G:B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

    Size

    height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161.3 x 75.3 ( = 0.33 x 6.35 x 2.96 in)

    Battery

    6100 mAh Silicon-Carbon

    Charging

    wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

    Operating System

    Android 15

    Camera

    Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.4, 23 mm, 1/1.31″, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.5, 120 m, telephoto, OIS, 5x optical zoom) + 50 MPix (f/2.2, 14 mm, ultrawide)
    Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 22 mm)

    Additional features

    Speakers: Stereo, charger, case, USB cable, HyperOS 2, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, IP68; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (G1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B1c, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), fanless, waterproof

    Weight

    216 g ( = 7.62 oz / 0.48 pounds), Power Supply: 104 g ( = 3.67 oz / 0.23 pounds)

    Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

    Colour selection of the Xiaomi 15S Pro

    The design and dimensions of the Xiaomi 15S Pro are identical to those of the standard Pro model. It features a water-resistant chassis rated to the IP68 standard. High-quality materials and excellent build precision give this premium smartphone a refined and sophisticated feel. With a screen-to-body ratio of 90 percent, the 15S Pro also makes efficient use of its front surface area.

    The matte finish on the back helps minimise visible fingerprints. Xiaomi uses Dragon Crystal Glass, and the aluminium frame transitions seamlessly into the glass body. In the hand, the 15S Pro feels exceptionally cohesive and well balanced.

    162.3 mm / 6.39 in 76.7 mm / 3.02 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 215 g0.474 lbs161.3 mm / 6.35 in 75.3 mm / 2.96 in 8.7 mm / 0.3425 in 213 g0.4696 lbs161.3 mm / 6.35 in 75.3 mm / 2.96 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 216 g0.4762 lbs158.4 mm / 6.24 in 75.8 mm / 2.98 in 7.3 mm / 0.2874 in 190 g0.4189 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 199 g0.4387 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

    The Xiaomi smartphone offers a well-rounded feature set including USB OTG, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, an infrared blaster, and a UWB chip. It also includes a high-speed USB port with 3.2 Gen 2 specification, which supports wired video output. According to the manufacturer, sensitive data such as biometric information and passwords are protected by a dedicated in-house security chip built into the device.

    The Xiaomi 15S Pro ships with the second-generation HyperOS and comes with Play Protect certification. Xiaomi remains vague about software update policies for the Chinese market. At the time of testing, the device was running security patches from May 2025.

    As is typical for the manufacturer’s Chinese models, Google services are not supported out of the box. Instead, Xiaomi’s own ecosystem and local Chinese services are used.

    However, Google frameworks are preinstalled, meaning users only need to install the Play Store manually via Xiaomi’s app store. The system language can be set to Chinese or English. A German language pack is not available, which may be a drawback for German-speaking users considering an import.

    The packaging of the Xiaomi 15S Pro is made of cardboard, and the device itself is wrapped in paper. Xiaomi does not provide detailed information about the materials used or their recycling rates, but the company states that it is increasing the use of recycled materials across all its smartphones.

    Although the 15S Pro is unlikely to see a global release, it offers broad support for both 5G and 4G mobile network bands. All frequency bands relevant for German-speaking regions are supported, making the device viable for import.

    Equipped with Wi-Fi 7, the Xiaomi smartphone achieves peak transfer speeds of up to 1,800 Mbps when tested with the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router. This is made possible by the device’s ability to operate in the 6 GHz band. However, upload speeds during testing were noticeably lower.

    Networking
    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    508 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼28%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1524 (min: 1222) MBit/s ∼95%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Wi-Fi 7
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    816 (min: 564) MBit/s ∼45%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1520 (min: 1364) MBit/s ∼94%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Wi-Fi 7
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼99%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼72%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼75%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Wi-Fi 7
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    563 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼31%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1610 (min: 1480) MBit/s ∼100%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Wi-Fi 7
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    955 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼87%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    795 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼68%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    1830 (min: 1666) MBit/s ∼100%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1602 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼100%

    Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
     
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000






    966 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼88%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000






    1167 (min: 810) MBit/s ∼100%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






    1283 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






    1441 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼90%

    Average of class Smartphone
     
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000






    727 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼66%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000






    733 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼63%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






    1383 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼76%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






    1388 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼86%

    050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip

    Xiaomi 15S Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø508 (412-574)

    Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1830 (1666-1889)

    Xiaomi 15S Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1524 (1222-1653)

    Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1601 (1387-1829)

    Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø955 (858-990)

    Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø794 (680-916)

    To assess real-world positioning accuracy, we recorded a short cycling route for comparison using the Garmin Venu 2. The route data from the Xiaomi smartphone shows some minor deviations in detail but overall provides accurate location tracking.

    Thanks to dual band support for satellite systems, positioning is both highly precise with accuracy around two metres and very quick.

    The Xiaomi 15S Pro is equipped with four microphones and supports two physical nano SIM cards. eSIM functionality is not available in the Chinese version. However, the device does support VoLTE and calls over domestic Wi-Fi networks.

    Voice quality is good, with voices reproduced clearly and at an adequate volume.

    Selfie with the Xiaomi 15S Pro

    The rear-facing triple camera setup with Leica branding remains unchanged from the Pro model . The 50 MP main camera uses a 1/1.31-inch sensor and features optical image stabilisation. It delivers strong detail and very fast capture performance. However, colour accuracy shows occasional deviations, which may disappoint at this price point.

    The Leica periscope lens offers a 50 MP resolution with OIS, enabling 5x lossless zoom and maintaining good sharpness even at up to 10x magnification. The 14 mm ultra-wide-angle camera is somewhat less convincing, though overall image quality remains acceptable for the price bracket.

    For video recording, both Dolby Vision and HDR10+ are supported. Footage can be captured in 8K at 30 frames per second, or in UHD at up to 60 frames per second.

    Image comparison

    Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

    HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightUltraweitwinkel

    click to load images

    12.2 ∆E

    15.2 ∆E

    23.2 ∆E

    19.8 ∆E

    20 ∆E

    14.4 ∆E

    9 ∆E

    11.4 ∆E

    14.1 ∆E

    3.2 ∆E

    13.6 ∆E

    9 ∆E

    4.6 ∆E

    13.3 ∆E

    5.3 ∆E

    7.6 ∆E

    9.3 ∆E

    16.2 ∆E

    5.3 ∆E

    9.2 ∆E

    15 ∆E

    10.9 ∆E

    4.2 ∆E

    10.5 ∆E

    ColorChecker Xiaomi 15S Pro: 11.52 ∆E min: 3.2 – max: 23.21 ∆E

    21.3 ∆E

    17.5 ∆E

    23.6 ∆E

    21 ∆E

    27.7 ∆E

    22.4 ∆E

    21.8 ∆E

    18.5 ∆E

    17 ∆E

    19.6 ∆E

    16.7 ∆E

    23.2 ∆E

    18.1 ∆E

    19.2 ∆E

    13.6 ∆E

    10.7 ∆E

    19.6 ∆E

    23.2 ∆E

    20.1 ∆E

    15.8 ∆E

    14.8 ∆E

    22.3 ∆E

    18.8 ∆E

    12.8 ∆E

    ColorChecker Xiaomi 15S Pro: 19.14 ∆E min: 10.72 – max: 27.66 ∆E
    Xiaomi 15S Pro power adapter

    The box includes a 90-watt fast charger, a protective case and a USB cable. A screen protector is also pre-applied. Our review sample from Trading Shenzhen additionally came with an EU power adapter and a USB OTG adapter, extending the standard contents for the Chinese version.

    The imported device comes with a 12-month warranty. This applies specifically to our review unit sourced from Trading Shenzhen and may differ depending on the country of purchase. In the event of a warranty claim, returns can be sent to a German shipping address provided by the retailer.

    Inputs on the OLED display are registered quickly and precisely, even at the edges of the touchscreen. The manufacturer specifies a touch sampling rate of up to 300 Hz. The 15S Pro offers smooth handling throughout, and the X-axis vibration motor provides crisp haptic feedback.

    For authentication, the Xiaomi smartphone uses a 3D ultrasonic fingerprint sensor integrated into the display, which reliably recognises registered fingerprints. Biometric face recognition is also available, though only via a relatively insecure 2D face unlock function.

    Subpixel structure

    The 6.73-inch display on the 15S Pro supports a 120 Hz refresh rate and offers a sharp 1440p resolution. Thanks to LTPO technology, the Xiaomi phone can reduce the refresh rate down to 1 Hz to conserve power.

    In our tests, the panel reached a peak brightness of 3,142 cd/m² using the realistic APL18 pattern, coming very close to the advertised maximum of 3,200 nits.

    As with typical OLED displays, Xiaomi uses PWM to control brightness. The device operates at a high PWM frequency of 1,920 Hz, as per the manufacturer. However, we observed baseline flickering at approximately 90 Hz. Oscilloscope measurements indicated consistent amplitude across the entire brightness range.

    955
    cd/m²
    976
    cd/m²
    962
    cd/m²
    964
    cd/m²
    983
    cd/m²
    951
    cd/m²
    946
    cd/m²
    910
    cd/m²
    894
    cd/m²

    Distribution of brightness

    tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

    Maximum: 983 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 949 cd/m² Minimum: 1.4 cd/m²
    Brightness Distribution: 91 %
    Center on Battery: 993 cd/m²
    Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
    ΔE Color 2.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
    ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
    99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
    Gamma: 2.233

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    3200×1440, 6.7″
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    AMOLED, 3200×1440, 6.7″
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120×1440, 6.7″
    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    AMOLED, 2780×1264, 6.8″
    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    OLED, 2856×1280, 6.3″
    Screen

    23%

    20%

    39%

    69%

    Brightness middle

    983

    1016

    3%

    1371

    39%

    1167

    19%

    2083

    112%

    Brightness

    949

    1017

    7%

    1370

    44%

    1160

    22%

    2016

    112%

    Brightness Distribution

    91

    98

    8%

    96

    5%

    98

    8%

    84

    -8%

    Black Level *
    Colorchecker dE 2000 *

    2.07

    1.15

    44%

    2.7

    -30%

    0.87

    58%

    0.7

    66%

    Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

    5.24

    3.57

    32%

    4.2

    20%

    1.64

    69%

    2

    62%

    Greyscale dE 2000 *

    3.3

    1.9

    42%

    2

    39%

    1.4

    58%

    1.1

    67%

    Gamma

    2.233 99%

    2.2 100%

    2.03 108%

    2.311 95%

    2.22 99%

    CCT

    7224 90%

    6677 97%

    6450 101%

    6426 101%

    6560 99%

    * … smaller is better

    Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

    ℹ

    To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

    Screen flickering / PWM detected 91.4 Hz
    Amplitude: 38 %

    The display backlight flickers at 91.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

    The frequency of 91.4 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

    In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8356 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

    Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness.)

    The range of display settings is impressively extensive. In addition to various colour profiles, users can also adjust the colour temperature and fine-tune individual parameters. In the “Original Pro” profile, colour deviations are barely noticeable.

    Display Response Times

    ℹ

    Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       ↔    Response Time Black to White
    18.6 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 1.2 ms rise
    ↘ 17.4 ms fall
    The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
    In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
    This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
    6.3 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 5 ms rise
    ↘ 1.3 ms fall
    The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
    In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
    This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

    Outdoors, the 15S Pro leaves a strong impression. Even under direct sunlight, display content remains clearly visible. Viewing angle stability is also excellent, with no cause for criticism.

    The XRing O1 chip is manufactured using a 3 nm process and reaches clock speeds of up to 3.9 GHz. In Geekbench, the Xiaomi CPU performs at a similar level to the Snapdragon 8 Elite found in the Pro model, although the Xiaomi 15 Pro still holds a slight advantage.

    Graphics processing is handled by an integrated Immortalis G925 with 16 cores, which shows strong results in GPU benchmarks and does not need to shy away from the competition. While the 15S Pro does not outperform a Galaxy S25 Ultra in demanding GFXBench tests, it still achieves 50 FPS at 4K resolution.

    Geekbench 6.4
    Single-Core
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    3136 Points +5%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    3089 Points +3%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    2985 Points

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (2718 – 2985, n=2)





    2852 Points -4%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    2605 Points -13%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    1971 Points -34%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (196 – 3479, n=212, last 2 years)





    1592 Points -47%

    Multi-Core
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    10029 Points +8%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    9404 Points +2%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    9250 Points

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (9097 – 9250, n=2)





    9174 Points -1%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    7480 Points -19%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    4820 Points -48%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (830 – 10401, n=212, last 2 years)





    4579 Points -50%

    Antutu v10 – Total Score
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    2611586 Points +5%

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (2487133 – 2599957, n=2)





    2543545 Points +2%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    2487133 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    2374537 Points -5%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    2271821 Points -9%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (142748 – 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)





    1340846 Points -46%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    1139380 Points -54%

    PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    20673 Points +34%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    18231 Points +18%

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (15446 – 16503, n=2)





    15975 Points +3%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    15446 Points

    Average of class Smartphone
      (4507 – 27169, n=199, last 2 years)





    14209 Points -8%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    12314 Points -20%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    11823 Points -23%

    CrossMark – Overall
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    2674 Points +17%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    2309 Points +1%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    2276 Points

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (2155 – 2276, n=2)





    2216 Points -3%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    1145 Points -50%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (187 – 2674, n=154, last 2 years)





    1027 Points -55%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    1021 Points -55%

    BaseMark OS II
    Overall
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    13223 Points +10%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    11988 Points

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (11376 – 11988, n=2)





    11682 Points -3%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    10697 Points -11%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    9067 Points -24%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    7716 Points -36%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (1196 – 14066, n=159, last 2 years)





    6989 Points -42%

    System
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    17481 Points +11%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    15799 Points

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (15399 – 15799, n=2)





    15599 Points -1%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    14976 Points -5%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    12891 Points -18%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (2368 – 20776, n=159, last 2 years)





    10814 Points -32%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    8029 Points -49%

    Memory
    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    20652 Points

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (17036 – 20652, n=2)





    18844 Points -9%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    16264 Points -21%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    10197 Points -51%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    9432 Points -54%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    7873 Points -62%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (962 – 20652, n=159, last 2 years)





    7832 Points -62%

    Graphics
    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    56004 Points +97%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    45691 Points +61%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    44154 Points +55%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    28402 Points

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (28099 – 28402, n=2)





    28251 Points -1%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    23041 Points -19%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (1046 – 384996, n=159, last 2 years)





    22381 Points -21%

    Web
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    2353 Points +5%

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (2232 – 2273, n=2)





    2253 Points +1%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    2232 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    1923 Points -14%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    1879 Points -16%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (858 – 2363, n=159, last 2 years)





    1630 Points -27%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    1278 Points -43%

    UL Procyon AI Inference for Android – Overall Score NNAPI
    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    75143 Points +256%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    36578 Points +73%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    23141 Points +10%

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (21087 – 23087, n=2)





    22087 Points +5%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    21254 Points +1%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    21087 Points

    Average of class Smartphone
      (1267 – 81594, n=150, last 2 years)





    18558 Points -12%

    AImark – Score v3.x
    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


    51509 Points +2499%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (82 – 307528, n=134, last 2 years)





    27654 Points +1295%

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (1982 – 2087, n=2)





    2035 Points +3%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    1987 Points 0%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    1982 Points

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    1891 Points -5%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    1146 Points -42%

    AI Benchmark
    Score V5
    Average of class Smartphone
      (46.4 – 3334, n=38, last 2 years)





    972 Points

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    245 Points

    Score V6
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    10739 Points +1508%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    10534 Points +1477%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (68.9 – 12578, n=54, last 2 years)





    4386 Points +557%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


    1112 Points +66%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


    668 Points

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
      (611 – 668, n=2)





    640 Points -4%

    3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    6885 Points +9%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    6521 Points +4%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    6294 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    5383 Points -14%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    2605 Points -59%

    3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    7029 Points +11%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    6567 Points +4%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    6311 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    6303 Points 0%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    2547 Points -60%

    3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
    3DMark / Solar Bay Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    12400 Points +29%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    11654 Points +21%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    9604 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    9461 Points -1%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    Points -100%

    3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    12747 Points +33%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    11589 Points +21%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    9594 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    9553 Points 0%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    Points -100%

    3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    2602 Points +6%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    2525 Points +3%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    2458 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    1998 Points -19%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    1026 Points -58%

    3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    2698 Points +10%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    2576 Points +5%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    2443 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    2054 Points -16%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    1001 Points -59%

    GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    60 fps -50%

    GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    818 fps

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    763 fps -7%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    744 fps -9%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    697 fps -15%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    415 fps -49%

    GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    119 fps -1%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    64 fps -47%

    GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    469 fps +26%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    450 fps +21%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    423 fps +14%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    371 fps

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    245 fps -34%

    GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    104 fps -13%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    60 fps -50%

    GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    341 fps +14%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    308 fps +3%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    299 fps

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    283 fps -5%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    165 fps -45%

    GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    60 fps -50%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    54 fps -55%

    GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    209 fps +15%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    182 fps

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    178 fps -2%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    172 fps -5%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    85 fps -53%

    GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps +26%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    106 fps +12%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    95 fps

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    60 fps -37%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    47 fps -51%

    GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    112 fps +8%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    107 fps +3%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    104 fps

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    98 fps -6%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    44 fps -58%

    GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    120 fps 0%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    120 fps

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    77 fps -36%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    60 fps -50%

    GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    286 fps +12%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    276 fps +8%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    255 fps

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    247 fps -3%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    119 fps -53%

    GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    52 fps +4%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    50 fps

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    48 fps -4%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    41 fps -18%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    20 fps -60%

    Speedometer 3.0 – Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)


    29 runs/min +100%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)


    28.9 runs/min +99%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)


    16.3 runs/min +12%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)


    15.8 runs/min +9%

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (14.5 – 16.9, n=2)





    15.7 runs/min +8%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro


    14.5 runs/min

    Average of class Smartphone (1.03 – 34, n=103, last 2 years)





    12.8 runs/min -12%

    WebXPRT 4 – Overall
    Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)


    255 Points +30%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)


    239 Points +22%

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (196 – 198, n=2)





    197 Points +1%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chrome 137)


    196 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)


    147 Points -25%

    Average of class Smartphone (22 – 273, n=157, last 2 years)





    130.8 Points -33%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)


    106 Points -46%

    Octane V2 – Total Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)


    98817 Points +22%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)


    84676 Points +4%

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (81076 – 81322, n=2)





    81199 Points 0%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro


    81076 Points

    Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)


    60987 Points -25%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)


    60566 Points -25%

    Average of class Smartphone (2228 – 100368, n=211, last 2 years)





    44064 Points -46%

    Mozilla Kraken 1.1 – Total
    Average of class Smartphone (277 – 28190, n=166, last 2 years)





    1324 ms * -164%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)


    699 ms * -39%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)


    625.4 ms * -24%

    Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (502 – 551, n=2)





    527 ms * -5%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chromne 137)


    502.34 ms *

    Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)


    423.11 ms * +16%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)


    388.7 ms * +23%

    * … smaller is better

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi 15 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25+ Oppo Find X8 Pro Google Pixel 9 Pro Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash Average of class Smartphone
    AndroBench 3-5

    -4%

    -20%

    -27%

    -64%

    -11%

    -45%

    Sequential Read 256KB

    3786.34

    3998.65

    6%

    4057.35

    7%

    3482.9

    -8%

    1717.9

    -55%

    3917 3754 – 4110, n=5)

    3%

    2109 270 – 4384, n=194, last 2 years)

    -44%

    Sequential Write 256KB

    3649.81

    3673.38

    1%

    3311.02

    -9%

    3498.5

    -4%

    253.53

    -93%

    3582 3464 – 3761, n=5)

    -2%

    1712 103.2 – 4030, n=194, last 2 years)

    -53%

    Random Read 4KB

    422.84

    409.67

    -3%

    294.51

    -30%

    375.7

    -11%

    218.41

    -48%

    356 311 – 423, n=5)

    -16%

    291 47.6 – 504, n=194, last 2 years)

    -31%

    Random Write 4KB

    677.95

    555.55

    -18%

    351.16

    -48%

    100.4

    -85%

    261.55

    -61%

    476 379 – 678, n=5)

    -30%

    334 9.4 – 964, n=194, last 2 years)

    -51%

    0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip

    Surface temperatures are relatively high. However, in the 3DMark Wild Life stress tests, the 15S Pro shows only a moderate performance drop of around 10 to 15 percent.

      46.1 °C
    115 F
    46.2 °C
    115 F
    42.8 °C
    109 F
     
      47.6 °C
    118 F
    45.3 °C
    114 F
    43.3 °C
    110 F
     
      48.2 °C
    119 F
    46.6 °C
    116 F
    43 °C
    109 F
     
    Maximum: 48.2 °C = 119 F
    Average: 45.5 °C = 114 F
    40.3 °C
    105 F
    44.5 °C
    112 F
    44.5 °C
    112 F
    41.2 °C
    106 F
    43.9 °C
    111 F
    45 °C
    113 F
    42.3 °C
    108 F
    44.7 °C
    112 F
    45.7 °C
    114 F
    Maximum: 45.7 °C = 114 F
    Average: 43.6 °C = 110 F

    Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

    (-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
    (-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
    (-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
    (±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

    3DMark
    Wild Life Stress Test Stability
    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    92.3 % +3%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    89.8 %

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    75.3 % -16%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    67.6 % -25%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    53.4 % -41%

    Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    86.4 %

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    75.8 % -12%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    69.3 % -20%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    58 % -33%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    51.3 % -41%

    Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    87.4 %

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    83.8 % -4%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    58.9 % -33%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    55.5 % -36%

    Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    84.3 %

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


    77.3 % -8%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


    76.5 % -9%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    66.5 % -21%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    61 % -28%

    0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø32.1 (31.1-36)

    Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.8 (26.6-35)

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø99.6 (96.9-107.9)

    Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.5 (96.3-128)

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.9 (28.8-32.9)

    Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.4 (28.1-33.5)

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø16.2 (15.8-18.8)

    Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.2 (13.9-18.1)

    The Xiaomi smartphone uses a dual-speaker setup that delivers impressive sound. Light bass is present, although the pink noise test reveals a somewhat uneven frequency response. For external audio output, users can connect via the USB port (wired) or use Bluetooth 5.4 (wireless).

    dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.836.12535.5363130.328.64037.229.25032.631.86318.221.98018.331.310021.141.412518.648.41601652.820016.256.225018.357.931517.859.740014.258.750014.963.163018.865.280020.369.2100016.872.8125014.877.516001780.120001479.9250012.676.731501270.6400011.872.550001266.1630012.167.380001271.41000012751250011.869.11600011.470.9SPL27.187N0.964.9median 14.8median 69.1Delta37.340.539.132.236.533.230.931.129.738.540.226.133.924.632.819.536.618.341.516.354.515.455.71455.715.158.213.263.111.568.811.868.713.472.915.27613.375.31371.112.771.513.971.814.277.11481.214.685.413.781.413.680.813.578.513.476.512.666.825.990.60.781.3median 13.7median 71.818.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

    The 15S Pro uses a new battery generation that combines silicon and carbon at the anode. The 6,100 mAh battery supports fast charging via USB-C at 90 watts or wireless charging at 50 watts. In our test, charging took just about 55 minutes when using Boost mode.

    The device demonstrates efficient power consumption both at idle and under load.

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    6100 mAh
    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    6100 mAh
    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    4900 mAh
    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    5910 mAh
    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    4700 mAh
    Average Xiaomi Xring O1
     
    Average of class Smartphone
     
    Power Consumption

    17%

    -22%

    17%

    -12%

    -107%

    -7%

    Idle Minimum *

    0.8

    0.6

    25%

    0.45

    44%

    0.6

    25%

    0.59

    26%

    2.65 0.8 – 4.5, n=2)

    -231%

    0.87 0.4 – 1.65, n=162, last 2 years)

    -9%

    Idle Average *

    1.4

    0.9

    36%

    1.09

    22%

    0.8

    43%

    1.1

    21%

    3.1 1.4 – 4.8, n=2)

    -121%

    1.424 0.6 – 4.36, n=162, last 2 years)

    -2%

    Idle Maximum *

    1.7

    1.1

    35%

    1.13

    34%

    0.9

    47%

    1.2

    29%

    3.45 1.7 – 5.2, n=2)

    -103%

    1.581 0.85 – 4.46, n=162, last 2 years)

    7%

    Load Average *

    6.3

    6.7

    -6%

    14.41

    -129%

    6.8

    -8%

    7.15

    -13%

    9.1 6.3 – 11.9, n=2)

    -44%

    7.13 2.3 – 16.5, n=149, last 2 years)

    -13%

    Load Maximum *

    9.1

    9.5

    -4%

    16.37

    -80%

    10.9

    -20%

    20.37

    -124%

    12.4 9.1 – 15.7, n=2)

    -36%

    10.7 3.53 – 20.8, n=149, last 2 years)

    -18%

    * … smaller is better

    0123456789Tooltip

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.3 (1.352-9.01)

    Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.51 (0.64-9.38)

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.922 (0.711-1.47)

    Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

    0123456789Tooltip

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.92 (8.78-8.97)

    Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.37 (9.34-9.41)

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.922 (0.711-1.47)

    Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

    In our Wi-Fi test at a calibrated display brightness of 150 cd/m², the 15S Pro lasts for over 25 hours, which represents an excellent runtime.

    Battery Runtime

    WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137) 25h 26min

    The Xiaomi 15S Pro is an excellent smartphone, though it is unlikely to receive an official release in Europe.

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    – 06/26/2025 v8

    Marcus Herbrich

    Connectivity

    69 / 69 → 100%

    Games Performance

    52 / 55 → 95%

    Application Performance

    76 / 85 → 89%

    Smartphone – Weighted Average

    CO2 Emissions
    No Data

    Materials
    35%

    Packaging
    50%

    Power Use
    96%

    Repairability
    50%

    Software Updates
    60%

    Total Sustainability Score: 48.5%

    Image

    Model / Review

    Price

    Weight

    Drive

    Display

    1.

    89.8%

    Xiaomi 15S Pro
    Xiaomi Xring O1 ⎘
    ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16 ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $7.99
    Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible …
    2. $16.79
    Bruni Screen Protector compa…
    3. $10.32
    HGJTFANY [4 Pcs Screen Prote…
    List Price: 830€
    216 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.73″
    3200×1440
    521 PPI

    2.

    89.9%

    Xiaomi 15 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
    Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $2.49
    Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible …
    2. $8.88
    Foebxxs [2 Pack Hydrogel Fle…
    3. $8.99
    Anbzsign (2+2 Pack for Xiaom…
    List Price: 810€
    213 g 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.73″
    3200×1440
    521 PPI
    AMOLED

    3.

    88.4%

    Samsung Galaxy S25+
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
    Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
    12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $16.99
    Super Fast Charger Type C, 2…
    2. $7.98
    firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree…
    3. $16.99
    S25 S24 S23 S22 Ultra Samsun…
    List Price: 1149 Euro
    190 g 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.70″
    3120×1440
    513 PPI
    Dynamic AMOLED 2X

    4.

    87.3%

    Oppo Find X8 Pro
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
    ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $15.99
    AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr…
    2. $7.27
    GANGANPRO 2 Pack Privacy Scr…
    3. $9.99
    WRTBS Phone Case for Oppo Fi…
    List Price: 1199€
    215 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.78″
    2780×1264
    450 PPI
    AMOLED

    5.

    85.7%

    Google Pixel 9 Pro
    Google Tensor G4 ⎘
    ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 128 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $999.00
    Google Pixel 9 Pro – Unlocke…
    2. $1,799.00
    Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold – Un…
    3. $899.00
    Google Pixel 9 – Unlocked An…
    199 g 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.30″
    2856×1280
    495 PPI
    OLED

    More articles related to this device

    Xiaomi 15S Pro (15 Series)

    Transparency

    The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

    This is how Notebookcheck is testing

    Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

    I have always been very passionately interested in mobile technologies, especially smartphones. Being a tech enthusiast means the half-life of my devices isn’t exactly long, and being the latest hardware is not enough to suffice as the manufacturer and operating system play a minor role – the most important aspect for me is that the device is state-of-the-art. After posting for Mobi Test I joined Notebookcheck in 2016, where I have been pursuing my enthusiasm for technology by reviewing the latest smartphone, tablet, and accessory trends.

    Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy – Editorial Assistant – 561422 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

    My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck’s long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch.”

    Marcus Herbrich, 2025-07- 1 (Update: 2025-07- 1)

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleApple’s 5.5 mm iPhone Air to replace Plus model in 2025 iPhone 17 lineup
    Next Article MagicX Zero 40 impresses in initial reviews after surprise early release
    TechAiVerse
    • Website

    Jonathan is a tech enthusiast and the mind behind Tech AI Verse. With a passion for artificial intelligence, consumer tech, and emerging innovations, he deliver clear, insightful content to keep readers informed. From cutting-edge gadgets to AI advancements and cryptocurrency trends, Jonathan breaks down complex topics to make technology accessible to all.

    Related Posts

    Spotify’s new feature makes it easier to find popular audiobooks

    March 3, 2026

    This portable JBL Grip Bluetooth speaker is so good at 20% off

    March 3, 2026

    ‘AI’ could dox your anonymous posts

    March 3, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Ping, You’ve Got Whale: AI detection system alerts ships of whales in their path

    April 22, 2025703 Views

    Lumo vs. Duck AI: Which AI is Better for Your Privacy?

    July 31, 2025285 Views

    6.7 Cummins Lifter Failure: What Years Are Affected (And Possible Fixes)

    April 14, 2025164 Views

    6 Best MagSafe Phone Grips (2025), Tested and Reviewed

    April 6, 2025124 Views
    Don't Miss
    Technology March 3, 2026

    Spotify’s new feature makes it easier to find popular audiobooks

    Spotify’s new feature makes it easier to find popular audiobooks Image: Spotify Summary created by…

    This portable JBL Grip Bluetooth speaker is so good at 20% off

    ‘AI’ could dox your anonymous posts

    Microsoft says new Teams location feature isn’t for ’employee tracking’

    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    About Us
    About Us

    Welcome to Tech AI Verse, your go-to destination for everything technology! We bring you the latest news, trends, and insights from the ever-evolving world of tech. Our coverage spans across global technology industry updates, artificial intelligence advancements, machine learning ethics, and automation innovations. Stay connected with us as we explore the limitless possibilities of technology!

    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Spotify’s new feature makes it easier to find popular audiobooks

    March 3, 20262 Views

    This portable JBL Grip Bluetooth speaker is so good at 20% off

    March 3, 20262 Views

    ‘AI’ could dox your anonymous posts

    March 3, 20261 Views
    Most Popular

    7 Best Kids Bikes (2025): Mountain, Balance, Pedal, Coaster

    March 13, 20250 Views

    VTOMAN FlashSpeed 1500: Plenty Of Power For All Your Gear

    March 13, 20250 Views

    Best TV Antenna of 2025

    March 13, 20250 Views
    © 2026 TechAiVerse. Designed by Divya Tech.
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.