Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Meta could end up owning 10% of AMD in new chip deal

    Scientists crack the case of “screeching” Scotch tape

    Pentagon buyer: We’re happy with our launch industry, but payloads are lagging

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Business Technology
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Gadgets
    • Gaming
    • Health
    • Software and Apps
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    Tech AI Verse
    • Home
    • Artificial Intelligence

      Tensions between the Pentagon and AI giant Anthropic reach a boiling point

      February 21, 2026

      Read the extended transcript: President Donald Trump interviewed by ‘NBC Nightly News’ anchor Tom Llamas

      February 6, 2026

      Stocks and bitcoin sink as investors dump software company shares

      February 4, 2026

      AI, crypto and Trump super PACs stash millions to spend on the midterms

      February 2, 2026

      To avoid accusations of AI cheating, college students are turning to AI

      January 29, 2026
    • Business

      Gartner: Why neoclouds are the future of GPU-as-a-Service

      February 21, 2026

      The HDD brand that brought you the 1.8-inch, 2.5-inch, and 3.5-inch hard drives is now back with a $19 pocket-sized personal cloud for your smartphones

      February 12, 2026

      New VoidLink malware framework targets Linux cloud servers

      January 14, 2026

      Nvidia Rubin’s rack-scale encryption signals a turning point for enterprise AI security

      January 13, 2026

      How KPMG is redefining the future of SAP consulting on a global scale

      January 10, 2026
    • Crypto

      XRP Struggles as On-Chain Stress Mounts: Is a Bottom Forming?

      February 23, 2026

      Vitalik Buterin Sold Over 8,800 ETH in February: Did It Impact the Price?

      February 23, 2026

      Vitalik Buterin Explains How Crypto Can Protect Users When Perfect Security Remains Impossible

      February 23, 2026

      Ethereum, Solana Defy L1 Myth — Bitwise CIO Sees Prediction Markets Changing Everything

      February 23, 2026

      5 Critical Factors That Could End Gold’s 7-Month Green Streak

      February 23, 2026
    • Technology

      Meta could end up owning 10% of AMD in new chip deal

      February 24, 2026

      Scientists crack the case of “screeching” Scotch tape

      February 24, 2026

      Pentagon buyer: We’re happy with our launch industry, but payloads are lagging

      February 24, 2026

      Data center builders thought farmers would willingly sell land, learn otherwise

      February 24, 2026

      Panasonic, the former plasma king, will no longer make its own TVs

      February 24, 2026
    • Others
      • Gadgets
      • Gaming
      • Health
      • Software and Apps
    Check BMI
    Tech AI Verse
    You are at:Home»Technology»realme GT 7 Smartphone Review: Killer value with lots of AI features in the upper mid-range
    Technology

    realme GT 7 Smartphone Review: Killer value with lots of AI features in the upper mid-range

    TechAiVerseBy TechAiVerseJuly 10, 2025No Comments28 Mins Read0 Views
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    realme GT 7 Smartphone Review: Killer value with lots of AI features in the upper mid-range
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    realme GT 7 Smartphone Review: Killer value with lots of AI features in the upper mid-range – NotebookCheck.net Reviews

    The realme GT 7 presents itself as a high-quality smartphone with IP69 certification, a huge 7,000 mAh battery, eSIM support and a versatile camera setup. 

    The performance is very good, and the camera setup offers a wide range of options for an upper mid-range smartphone.

    realme also provides the GT 7 with many AI functions, with the AI Planner feature standing out. 

    We were unable to measure the advertised, spectacular brightness of the display during testing, but the panel is still accurate. 

    Unfortunately, features such as wireless charging and 6 GHz Wi-Fi are not available.

    Pros

    + high performance

    + IP69 certified

    + large battery

    + fast charging up to 120 W

    + 6 years of updates

    Cons

    – USB 2.0 only

    – no wireless charging

    – 6 GHz WLAN missing

    The realme GT 7 can be purchased directly from Amazon, as it is only available in select European markets.

    However, any warranty claims can be easily processed from Germany or other EU countries.

    A 256 GB variant of the smartphone is available unlocked on Amazon US for $1,109.

    $299.89

    for Realme GT7 Pro GT 7 Pro RMX5010,RMX5011 6.78inch AMOLED LCD Display Touch Screen for Realme GT7 Pro Display Replacement

    • $11.99

      Ibywind 2 Pcs Screen Protector For Realme GT 7 Pro 5G 6.78″,Flexible TPU Film,With 1Pc Camera Lens Protector,1Pc Back Film,Bubble Free[Easy to install]

    • $7.99

      Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible for Realme GT 7 Pro Screen Protector Tempered Glass,Case Friendly High definition Anti Scratch 9H Hardness Compatible with Realme GT 7 Pro Screen Protector

    The realme GT 7 is an upper mid-range version of the realme GT 7 Pro and is the successor to the realme GT 6. It’s positioning in this segment aims to impress with a particularly good price-performance ratio.

    The GT 7 is available in two storage variants: 12/256 GB and 12/512 GB, which originally start at an RRP of €750 and €800, respectively but were already reduced by €100 at launch.

    A Dream Edition model is also available that has been created in collaboration with the Aston Martin F1 team. 

    The GT 7 Dream Edition is distinguished by more RAM, special accessories, an unusual color option, and costs €900.

    Display

    6.78 inch 19.79:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 450 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, Rain Water Smart Touch, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

    Storage

    512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 

    , 482.7 GB free

    Connections

    1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Proximity, eCompass, Gyroscope, OTG, IR-Blaster

    Networking

    Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

    Size

    height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 162.42 x 76.13 ( = 0.33 x 6.39 x 3 in)

    Battery

    7000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode

    Charging

    fast charging / Quickcharge

    Operating System

    Android 15

    Camera

    Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX906, 1/1.56″, f/1.8, OIS) + 50 MPix (2x opt. Zoom, Samsung S5KJN5, 1/2.8″, f/2.0) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
    Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (Sony IMX615, 1/2.74″, f/2.4)

    Additional features

    Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), SIM-Tool, realme UI 6.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, atpX TWS+, LHDC, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a, B2b), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP69 | Body-SAR: – W/kg, Head-SAR: – W/kg | max. charging speed: 120 W (wired), fanless, waterproof

    Weight

    206 g ( = 7.27 oz / 0.45 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

    Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

    The realme GT 7 is available in IceSense Black and IceSense Blue color options. The frame is made of aluminum, the front is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, and the graphene back has a matte finish. 

    The workmanship is of a good standard, although the gaps between the back and frame are not always completely even and the GT 7 creaks slightly when twisted. 

    It is also both dust and waterproof in accordance with IP69 standards and can even withstand high-pressure and steam jet cleaning.

    The USB port is only of the 2.0 specification, so there’s no DisplayPort-out supported. 

    The infrared transmitter can come in handy for remote control of air conditioning systems, cameras, entertainment devices, and the like.

    162.42 mm / 6.39 in 76.13 mm / 3 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 206 g0.4542 lbs160.8 mm / 6.33 in 76.1 mm / 3 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 205 g0.4519 lbs160.26 mm / 6.31 in 74.95 mm / 2.95 in 8.39 mm / 0.3303 in 212 g0.4674 lbs146.9 mm / 5.78 in 70.5 mm / 2.78 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 162 g0.3571 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

    In combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the realme GT 7 offers fast Wi-Fi throughput and delivers stable transfer rates. However, despite Wi-Fi 7 support, the 6 GHz band is not supported.

    The GT 7’s cellular reception is good in the city and we had no problems in the suburbs either. The voice quality of the smartphone is good when held to the ear, but ambient noise filtering is only moderate. 

    In addition to two nano-SIM cards, the GT 7 can also use an eSIM instead of the second physical SIM.

    For biometric security, an optical fingerprint sensor is integrated into the display, which offers fast recognition and quickly unlocks the smartphone. 

    Face recognition is also available via the front camera, although this quickly reaches its limits in the dark and is less secure.

    The Rain-Water-Smart-Touch function is practical and effectively prevents incorrect entries on the touchscreen due to water.

    Networking
    Realme GT 7
     
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    976 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼92%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    939 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼80%

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Wi-Fi 7
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    1058 (min: 518) MBit/s ∼100%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    1167 (min: 1006) MBit/s ∼100%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    1210 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼88%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1201 (min: 1184) MBit/s ∼81%

    Honor 400 Pro
    802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    958 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼91%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    810 (min: 771) MBit/s ∼69%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





    1238 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼90%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





    1483 (min: 1349) MBit/s ∼100%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000





    987 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼93%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000





    863 (min: 749) MBit/s ∼74%

    Global Average -3
     
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000






    979 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼93%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000






    1061 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼91%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






    1363 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼99%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






    1455 (min: 390) MBit/s ∼98%

    Average of class Smartphone
     
    iperf3 transmit AXE11000






    724 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼68%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000






    733 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼63%

    iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






    1382 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%

    iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






    1393 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼94%

    0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000Tooltip

    Realme GT 7  ; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (936-1000)

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø971 (506-1017)

    Realme GT 7  ; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø937 (926-953)

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø862 (749-919)

    The realme GT 7 comes with realme UI 6.0 layered on top of Google’s Android 15. According to the manufacturer, the GT 7 is eligible for four years of major updates and six years of security patches. 

    Numerous AI tools are included, which allow speech and text to be summarized, text creation, and the gaming experience. Additionally, realme also focuses on image post-processing. 

    However, the real highlight is the AI Planner feature that can filter out appointments from documents, emails or images, and enter them directly into calendars.

    When it comes to sustainability, however, realme is reluctant to make any concrete statements. 

    The outer packaging is plastic-free. Instructions for repairs or spare parts for customers are not offered.

    Selfie with the realme GT 7

    The front camera has a high 32 MP resolution but does not use pixel binning, which is particularly noticeable when taking pictures in low light. The details look a little artificial at full size, but otherwise the realme GT 7 takes very appealing selfies. Videos can be recorded in 4K Ultra HD 60 fps.

    The triple camera on the back includes two 50 MP sensors, but the zoom has to make do without optical image stabilization (OIS). It still delivers decent results in the digital zoom range up to 100x. 

    The main camera produces very high-contrast images and overdoes it with saturation, especially in dark green tones. The ultra-wide angle lens is of a low 8 MP resolution but surprises with decent results.

    Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 8K 30 fps, though Ultra HD videos can go even up to 120 FPS.

    Image comparison

    Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

    Main CameraMain CameraUltra-wide angle5x ZoomLow light

    click to load images

    16.2 ∆E

    12 ∆E

    19.3 ∆E

    18.4 ∆E

    16 ∆E

    11.3 ∆E

    12.4 ∆E

    13 ∆E

    11.5 ∆E

    15.3 ∆E

    10.7 ∆E

    9.7 ∆E

    11.6 ∆E

    20 ∆E

    7 ∆E

    9.3 ∆E

    10.7 ∆E

    15.3 ∆E

    8.8 ∆E

    9.6 ∆E

    13.6 ∆E

    22.3 ∆E

    18.6 ∆E

    12.8 ∆E

    ColorChecker Realme GT 7: 13.55 ∆E min: 6.98 – max: 22.3 ∆E

    19.4 ∆E

    20.4 ∆E

    23.1 ∆E

    22.7 ∆E

    25.6 ∆E

    31.6 ∆E

    20.5 ∆E

    16 ∆E

    14.3 ∆E

    19.6 ∆E

    25.4 ∆E

    28.7 ∆E

    17.2 ∆E

    25.8 ∆E

    10 ∆E

    18.6 ∆E

    19 ∆E

    27.6 ∆E

    16.9 ∆E

    17.1 ∆E

    26.5 ∆E

    28.3 ∆E

    21.6 ∆E

    13.5 ∆E

    ColorChecker Realme GT 7: 21.23 ∆E min: 10.01 – max: 31.61 ∆E
    Subpixel matrix

    The 6.78-inch OLED panel of the realme GT 7 is evenly illuminated, offers a high level of detail, and is an accurate color display. 

    The manufacturer promises brightness levels of up to 6,000 cd/m², but we could not confirm the same in our measurements. With a pure white display, we achieved an average of 1,530 cd/m² in our measurement. It doesn’t get any brighter with a reduced white area (APL18) or HDR playback.

    We measure the peak brightness via a measurement field in the developer options, but even here it stops at 2,746 cd/m².

    The OLED flickers at a relatively low base frequency of 90 Hz, but realme also uses high-frequency PWM dimming, which should reduce the impact on sensitive users.

    1513
    cd/m²
    1529
    cd/m²
    1561
    cd/m²
    1512
    cd/m²
    1519
    cd/m²
    1544
    cd/m²
    1515
    cd/m²
    1516
    cd/m²
    1557
    cd/m²

    Distribution of brightness

    tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

    Maximum: 1561 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1529.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.93 cd/m²
    Brightness Distribution: 97 %
    Center on Battery: 1519 cd/m²
    Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
    ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
    ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
    98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
    Gamma: 2.22

    Realme GT 7
    OLED, 2780×1264, 6.8″
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    AMOLED, 2340×1080, 6.2″
    Honor 400 Pro
    AMOLED, 2800×1280, 6.7″
    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Flow AMOLED, 3200×1440, 6.7″
    Screen

    -84%

    -15%

    -27%

    Brightness middle

    1519

    1301

    -14%

    1535

    1%

    1846

    22%

    Brightness

    1530

    1311

    -14%

    1531

    0%

    1850

    21%

    Brightness Distribution

    97

    98

    1%

    99

    2%

    93

    -4%

    Black Level *
    Colorchecker dE 2000 *

    1

    3.1

    -210%

    1.1

    -10%

    1.2

    -20%

    Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

    1.7

    4.4

    -159%

    2.2

    -29%

    2.9

    -71%

    Greyscale dE 2000 *

    1.1

    2.3

    -109%

    1.7

    -55%

    2.3

    -109%

    Gamma

    2.22 99%

    2.01 109%

    2.29 96%

    2.25 98%

    CCT

    6661 98%

    6454 101%

    6511 100%

    6707 97%

    * … smaller is better

    Display / HDR Peak Brightness
    Honor 400 Pro
    Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
    Realme GT 7
    Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
    Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
    Realme GT 7
    Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
    Honor 400 Pro
    Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

    Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

    ℹ

    To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

    Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz
    Amplitude: 16.76 %
    Secondary Frequency: 2083 Hz

    The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

    The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

    In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

    Display Response Times

    ℹ

    Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       ↔    Response Time Black to White
    1.23 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.578 ms rise
    ↘ 0.647 ms fall
    The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
    In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
    This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
    0.96 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.5155 ms rise
    ↘ 0.4465 ms fall
    The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
    In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
    This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

    The realme GT 7 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e. The SoC offers high performance in all areas and the system speed is very high in everyday use.

    The surface temperatures rise sharply in the 3DMark stress test and climb just above the 48 °C mark in places. This is high but not critical. The SoC remains stable in most stress tests, but throttles slightly in the more demanding ones.

    The GT 7’s two speakers deliver a good sound experience, but high tones sometimes distort a little at maximum volume. Bluetooth codec support is decent, but there’s no LC3 or Auracast support.

    With its 7,000 mAh battery battery, the smartphone is ideally equipped for long runtimes. These are at a very good level, but even longer run times would certainly have been possible with higher efficiency. 

    The GT 7 can be charged with a 120 W power adapter. Unfortunately, this was not available to us for testing.

    Geekbench 6.4
    Single-Core
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    3087 Points +36%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    2959 Points +31%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    2309 Points +2%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    2265 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    2265 Points 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    2031 Points -10%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (196 – 3479, n=205, last 2 years)





    1605 Points -29%

    Multi-Core
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    9776 Points +31%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    8711 Points +17%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    8154 Points +10%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    7439 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    7439 Points 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    6042 Points -19%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (830 – 10401, n=205, last 2 years)





    4624 Points -38%

    PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    20623 Points +56%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    19622 Points +48%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    17359 Points +31%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (4507 – 27169, n=193, last 2 years)





    14289 Points +8%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    13240 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    13240 Points 0%

    3DMark
    Wild Life Unlimited Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    27327 Points +48%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    22957 Points +24%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    18461 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    18461 Points 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    16971 Points -8%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (271 – 27493, n=188, last 2 years)





    9626 Points -48%

    Wild Life Extreme
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    6854 Points +29%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    5907 Points +11%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    5300 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    5300 Points 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    4593 Points -13%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (61 – 7094, n=193, last 2 years)





    2599 Points -51%

    Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    6932 Points +27%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    6036 Points +10%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    5466 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    5466 Points 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    4552 Points -17%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (62 – 7212, n=192, last 2 years)





    2588 Points -53%

    Solar Bay Unlimited Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    11687 Points +39%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    11553 Points +37%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    8407 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    8407 Points 0%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (2799 – 13318, n=82, last 2 years)





    8044 Points -4%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    7395 Points -12%

    Solar Bay Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    11765 Points +44%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    11251 Points +38%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    8165 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    8165 Points 0%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (3223 – 13244, n=82, last 2 years)





    7971 Points -2%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    7461 Points -9%

    GFXBench
    on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    121 fps +102%

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    120 fps +100%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    120 fps +100%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    60 fps

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    60 fps 0%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (5.5 – 166, n=202, last 2 years)





    56 fps -7%

    1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    279 fps +18%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    248 fps +5%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    236 fps

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    236 fps 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    189 fps -20%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (3.4 – 332, n=202, last 2 years)





    104.4 fps -56%

    on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    120 fps +100%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    88 fps +47%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    86 fps +43%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    60 fps

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    60 fps 0%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (0.85 – 144, n=203, last 2 years)





    44.4 fps -26%

    2560×1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    118 fps +26%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    94 fps 0%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    94 fps

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    94 fps 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    80 fps -15%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (1.2 – 129, n=202, last 2 years)





    41 fps -56%

    3840×2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    52 fps +24%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    43 fps +2%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    42 fps

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    42 fps 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    37 fps -12%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (0.54 – 53, n=203, last 2 years)





    19.1 fps -55%

    Octane V2 – Total Score
    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    95809 Points +108%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    94853 Points +105%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    46162 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    46162 Points 0%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (2228 – 100368, n=205, last 2 years)





    44427 Points -4%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    39175 Points -15%

    Geekbench AI
    Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    2472 Points +104%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    1214 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    1214 Points 0%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    650 Points -46%

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    633 Points -48%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (51 – 2472, n=55, last 2 years)





    508 Points -58%

    Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    5158 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    5158 Points 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    2460 Points -52%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (51 – 9453, n=55, last 2 years)





    1148 Points -78%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    647 Points -87%

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    619 Points -88%

    Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    4903 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    4903 Points 0%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    3667 Points -25%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (123 – 13084, n=55, last 2 years)





    1868 Points -62%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    1448 Points -70%

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    1298 Points -74%

    Jetstream 2 – 2.0 Total Score
    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


    243.318 Points +68%

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


    235.734 Points +63%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


    144.405 Points

    Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
      (n=1)





    144.4 Points 0%

    Average of class Smartphone
      (13.8 – 387, n=159, last 2 years)





    140.5 Points -3%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


    107.55 Points -26%

      46.8 °C
    116 F
    47.3 °C
    117 F
    46.8 °C
    116 F
     
      47 °C
    117 F
    47.1 °C
    117 F
    46.5 °C
    116 F
     
      45.6 °C
    114 F
    46.6 °C
    116 F
    44.8 °C
    113 F
     
    Maximum: 47.3 °C = 117 F
    Average: 46.5 °C = 116 F
    47.3 °C
    117 F
    47.8 °C
    118 F
    48 °C
    118 F
    47.1 °C
    117 F
    48 °C
    118 F
    48.3 °C
    119 F
    44.4 °C
    112 F
    46.9 °C
    116 F
    46 °C
    115 F
    Maximum: 48.3 °C = 119 F
    Average: 47.1 °C = 117 F

    Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

    (-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
    (-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
    (-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
    (+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

    3DMark
    Wild Life Stress Test Stability
    Realme GT 7
    Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    99.5 %

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    64.6 % -35%

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    52.7 % -47%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    42.7 % -57%

    Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
    Realme GT 7
    Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    99.3 %

    Honor 400 Pro
    Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    74 % -25%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    70.8 % -29%

    Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
    Realme GT 7
    Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    99.1 %

    Honor 400 Pro
    Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    75.8 % -24%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    74.5 % -25%

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    54.1 % -45%

    Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
    Honor 400 Pro
    Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    73.8 % +12%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


    70.1 % +6%

    Realme GT 7
    Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    65.9 %

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


    47.5 % -28%

    0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip

    Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø64.5 (64.3-64.7)

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.8 (76.2-144.6)

    Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.4 (38.6-90.4)

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø99.3 (82.3-127.5)

    Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.85 (9.82-9.89)

    Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.7 (8.23-11.1)

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.3)

    Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø20.1 (20-20.2)

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.2 (20.2-37.3)

    Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.3 (19.1-25.2)

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.1 (24.9-33.4)

    Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.1 (21-31.9)

    Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø25 (19.3-40.6)

    Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (20.3-27.4)

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø27.8 (25.4-36.2)

    dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.841.42530.1343126.734.54027.838.25035.939.66328.343.38028.839.510027.340.812517.247.416016.351.620014.752.425012.857.931513.259.940012.66050012.365.863012.269.280012.170.5100012.375.8125012.378.3160012.179.220001281.5250012.279.731501382.7400013.182.9500013.180.4630013.580.2800013.478.61000013.477.31250013.574.21600013.363.9SPL2591.6N0.687.3median 13.1median 75.8Delta1.79.338.239.332.533.221.92931.425.333.531.421.725.22424.317.828.716.638.419.753.61956.117.558.116.257.416.557.712.366.412.369.21572.613.275.612.475.811.676.713.380.31280.712.781.612.980.413.3781376.413.174.313.569.913.670.713.46425.489.90.778.3median 13.3median 72.61.710hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

    Battery Runtime

    WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137) 23h 45min

    The realme GT 7 offers a powerful overall package with many AI functions and a huge battery that you would not expect in a smartphone of this size.

    The camera setup is decent, but also shows a few shortcomings in the test. However, it is difficult to find anything comparable in this price range.

    Realme GT 7
    – 06/27/2025 v8

    Daniel Schmidt

    Connectivity

    43 / 69 → 63%

    Games Performance

    43 / 55 → 78%

    Application Performance

    69 / 85 → 81%

    Smartphone – Weighted Average

    CO2 Emissions
    No Data

    Materials
    25%

    Packaging
    95%

    Power Use
    96.8%

    Repairability
    40%

    Software Updates
    89%

    Total Sustainability Score: 57.6%

    Image

    Model / Review

    Price

    Weight

    Drive

    Display

    1.

    83.2%

    Realme GT 7
    Mediatek Dimensity 9400e ⎘
    ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
    12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $299.89
    for Realme GT7 Pro GT 7 Pro …
    2. $11.99
    Ibywind 2 Pcs Screen Protect…
    3. $7.99
    Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible …
    206 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.78″
    2780×1264
    450 PPI
    OLED

    2.

    88.9%

    Samsung Galaxy S25
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
    Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
    12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. 
    OtterBox Samsung Galaxy S25 …
    2. $7.98
    firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree…
    3. $18.99
    Super Fast Charger Type C, 2…
    List Price: 899€
    162 g 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.20″
    2340×1080
    416 PPI
    AMOLED

    3.

    82.5%

    Honor 400 Pro
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
    Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
    12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $11.32
    HGJTFANY [5 Pcs Screen Prote…
    2. $7.87
    FZZSZS (4-Pack for Honor 400…
    3. $6.88
    Damolong Screen Protector Co…
    List Price: 800€
    205 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.70″
    2800×1280
    460 PPI
    AMOLED

    4.

    85.3%

    Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
    Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
    16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
    Amazon:
    1. $7.99
    Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P…
    2. $10.19
    Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 U…
    3. $7.59
    Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi P…
    List Price: 800€
    212 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.67″
    3200×1440
    526 PPI
    Flow AMOLED

    More articles related to this device

    Realme GT 7 (GT7 Series)

    Transparency

    The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

    This is how Notebookcheck is testing

    Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

    Editor of the original article: Daniel Schmidt – Managing Editor Mobile – 664 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

    As a child I was fascinated by my Commodore 16, and this sparked my enthusiasm for computers. Using my first modem, I surfed the BTX videotext system and later the World Wide Web. I have always been captivated by the latest technologies, and this is especially true for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. I’ve been part of the Notebookcheck team since 2013 and have also on occasion written for Notebookinfo.de, and I’m looking forward to testing new innovations for our readers. I like to spend my spare time indulging in photography and barbecues and being with my family.

    Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy – Editorial Assistant – 566423 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

    My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck’s long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch.”

    Daniel Schmidt, 2025-07- 9 (Update: 2025-07- 9)

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleCAPCOM cancels Monster Hunter Wilds CEDEC 2025 performance lecture citing threats
    Next Article Ubisoft faces backlash over EULA clause mandating post-support game deletion
    TechAiVerse
    • Website

    Jonathan is a tech enthusiast and the mind behind Tech AI Verse. With a passion for artificial intelligence, consumer tech, and emerging innovations, he deliver clear, insightful content to keep readers informed. From cutting-edge gadgets to AI advancements and cryptocurrency trends, Jonathan breaks down complex topics to make technology accessible to all.

    Related Posts

    Meta could end up owning 10% of AMD in new chip deal

    February 24, 2026

    Scientists crack the case of “screeching” Scotch tape

    February 24, 2026

    Pentagon buyer: We’re happy with our launch industry, but payloads are lagging

    February 24, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Ping, You’ve Got Whale: AI detection system alerts ships of whales in their path

    April 22, 2025691 Views

    Lumo vs. Duck AI: Which AI is Better for Your Privacy?

    July 31, 2025278 Views

    6.7 Cummins Lifter Failure: What Years Are Affected (And Possible Fixes)

    April 14, 2025159 Views

    6 Best MagSafe Phone Grips (2025), Tested and Reviewed

    April 6, 2025122 Views
    Don't Miss
    Technology February 24, 2026

    Meta could end up owning 10% of AMD in new chip deal

    Meta could end up owning 10% of AMD in new chip deal Su said the…

    Scientists crack the case of “screeching” Scotch tape

    Pentagon buyer: We’re happy with our launch industry, but payloads are lagging

    Data center builders thought farmers would willingly sell land, learn otherwise

    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    About Us
    About Us

    Welcome to Tech AI Verse, your go-to destination for everything technology! We bring you the latest news, trends, and insights from the ever-evolving world of tech. Our coverage spans across global technology industry updates, artificial intelligence advancements, machine learning ethics, and automation innovations. Stay connected with us as we explore the limitless possibilities of technology!

    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    Meta could end up owning 10% of AMD in new chip deal

    February 24, 20262 Views

    Scientists crack the case of “screeching” Scotch tape

    February 24, 20262 Views

    Pentagon buyer: We’re happy with our launch industry, but payloads are lagging

    February 24, 20262 Views
    Most Popular

    7 Best Kids Bikes (2025): Mountain, Balance, Pedal, Coaster

    March 13, 20250 Views

    VTOMAN FlashSpeed 1500: Plenty Of Power For All Your Gear

    March 13, 20250 Views

    This new Roomba finally solves the big problem I have with robot vacuums

    March 13, 20250 Views
    © 2026 TechAiVerse. Designed by Divya Tech.
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.